Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 256C322E01
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 87/91] x86/microcode: Do not exit early from __reload_late()
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:25:09 -0700
Message-Id: <20180430184008.830295165@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180430184004.216234025@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180430184004.216234025@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

commit 09e182d17e8891dd73baba961a0f5a82e9274c97 upstream.

Vitezslav reported a case where the

  "Timeout during microcode update!"

panic would hit. After a deeper look, it turned out that his .config had
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU disabled which practically made save_mc_for_early() a
no-op.

When that happened, the discovered microcode patch wasn't saved into the
cache and the late loading path wouldn't find any.

This, then, lead to early exit from __reload_late() and thus CPUs waiting
until the timeout is reached, leading to the panic.

In hindsight, that function should have been written so it does not return
before the post-synchronization. Oh well, I know better now...

Fixes: bb8c13d61a62 ("x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine")
Reported-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Vitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418081140.GA2439@pc11.op.pod.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180421081930.15741-2-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -564,14 +564,12 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
 	apply_microcode_local(&err);
 	spin_unlock(&update_lock);
 
+	/* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */
 	if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) {
 		pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu);
-		return -1;
-	/* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */
+		ret = -1;
 	} else if (err == UCODE_UPDATED || err == UCODE_OK) {
 		ret = 1;
-	} else {
-		return ret;
 	}
 
 	/*