Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C9DC822DC1
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 57/91] bfq-iosched: ensure to clear bic/bfqq pointers when preparing request
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:24:39 -0700
Message-Id: <20180430184007.145652337@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180430184004.216234025@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180430184004.216234025@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

commit 72961c4e6082be79825265d9193272b8a1634dec upstream.

Even if we don't have an IO context attached to a request, we still
need to clear the priv[0..1] pointers, as they could be pointing
to previously used bic/bfqq structures. If we don't do so, we'll
either corrupt memory on dispatching a request, or cause an
imbalance in counters.

Inspired by a fix from Kees.

Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: aee69d78dec0 ("block, bfq: introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/bfq-iosched.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4447,8 +4447,16 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct r
 	bool new_queue = false;
 	bool bfqq_already_existing = false, split = false;
 
-	if (!rq->elv.icq)
+	/*
+	 * Even if we don't have an icq attached, we should still clear
+	 * the scheduler pointers, as they might point to previously
+	 * allocated bic/bfqq structs.
+	 */
+	if (!rq->elv.icq) {
+		rq->elv.priv[0] = rq->elv.priv[1] = NULL;
 		return;
+	}
+
 	bic = icq_to_bic(rq->elv.icq);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);