Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:48:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:48:18 -0500 Received: from sunrise.pg.gda.pl ([153.19.40.230]:48839 "EHLO sunrise.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:48:05 -0500 From: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz Message-Id: <200103152145.WAA22485@sunrise.pg.gda.pl> Subject: Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing? To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:45:35 +0100 (MET) Cc: fluffy@snurgle.org (William T Wilson), torrey.hoffman@myrio.com (Torrey Hoffman), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel mailing list) In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Mar 15, 2001 11:44:52 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rik van Riel wrote:" > total usage == maximum(swap, ram) Does it mean that having swap