Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp5207684imm; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpQ69B9Cb/kyrK1OgrEpkhigx0GscYlzz7+VmE5uYhedj8GiqLS43Ao3jSGpg/FmpBM8vW6 X-Received: by 2002:a63:7405:: with SMTP id p5-v6mr8689659pgc.289.1525196981422; Tue, 01 May 2018 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525196981; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gFphM5MhkIa5tK9MvOe9Hdfbp5Q/+uV1cTfsmsQ5Zu9iYYyhvvlJle9amrMd+gVDKI Tl1nFhogha+eI5zf1auT2UM6XHDGMymnw1E3qec1eYsfSccU/B0KbvSn4sCvIytKh8ja 9iLKLaFU3GnglBCQXMYcoMHTr2AzOwF0S2W1TxJUOQCDJCvOsy0UaAupNGerwhr7uePT fvNBG8EaKTyABRbewh4iDBnzFEqay3ZVkzL9NLU/hSokVQ1NbsZ/jrar1GU4ssXxjjrX 2M0+Qg30KUkeU2IT+QJm0X4fxwLqwBp3TwFVgj78MDlAfuywOzT+HQcfE9XhlFaRBTMi Y6lg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=BoIzDxcACu90X86/bwkAi1jTUvZBLkhxNnuhcYBLAw0=; b=hkNL3Oh6Q55S0F8eRInYj2UmyjVHRwyBT1PAGdqM0wV6OigV0U1yMcpt1Fv/pOA+Cs jVCYI9+lPInjDgCAR3ri9GmcmHNsfVqyQc1JXyjbctCIOso7CxoNtZpuc4AmCgppRGQ1 G9j4ml7YDU9w/AXyXlPVLeXwBHls2ygMsPpWczSsxnv0ZiolelA5IPafs2T0uDel3uDS XOVjB7uUW5ixij6gHrroQXrFodKfTfS5Q37GVJDBdVSf/Rn+LgQfzQ/twgIeyudKp8dP PDjX8z893fQVpOxu2loa4t13cZudx6PFgTANp/VM6LwGVgj52WglI6oLSKsiBrqB97Wv 9Rgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b62-v6si8034438pgc.505.2018.05.01.10.49.27; Tue, 01 May 2018 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932084AbeEARtO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 May 2018 13:49:14 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49930 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbeEARtL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2018 13:49:11 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB7C15BF; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.207.55] (melchizedek.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.207.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 860693F5AF; Tue, 1 May 2018 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: kexec_file: allow for loading Image-format kernel To: AKASHI Takahiro Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, dyoung@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180425062629.29404-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20180425062629.29404-7-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> From: James Morse Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 18:46:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180425062629.29404-7-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Akashi, On 25/04/18 07:26, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > This patch provides kexec_file_ops for "Image"-format kernel. In this > implementation, a binary is always loaded with a fixed offset identified > in text_offset field of its header. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h > index e4de1223715f..3cba4161818a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h > @@ -102,6 +102,56 @@ struct kimage_arch { > void *dtb_buf; > }; > > +/** > + * struct arm64_image_header - arm64 kernel image header > + * > + * @pe_sig: Optional PE format 'MZ' signature > + * @branch_code: Instruction to branch to stext > + * @text_offset: Image load offset, little endian > + * @image_size: Effective image size, little endian > + * @flags: > + * Bit 0: Kernel endianness. 0=little endian, 1=big endian Page size? What about 'phys_base'?, (whatever that is...) Probably best to refer to Documentation/arm64/booting.txt here, its the authoritative source of what these fields mean. > + * @reserved: Reserved > + * @magic: Magic number, "ARM\x64" > + * @pe_header: Optional offset to a PE format header > + **/ > + > +struct arm64_image_header { > + u8 pe_sig[2]; > + u8 pad[2]; > + u32 branch_code; > + u64 text_offset; > + u64 image_size; > + u64 flags; __le64 as appropriate here would let tools like sparse catch any missing endian conversion bugs. > + u64 reserved[3]; > + u8 magic[4]; > + u32 pe_header; > +}; I'm surprised we don't have a definition for this already, I guess its always done in asm. We have kernel/image.h that holds some of this stuff, if we are going to validate the flags, is it worth adding the code there, (and moving it to include/asm)? > +static const u8 arm64_image_magic[4] = {'A', 'R', 'M', 0x64U}; Any chance this magic could be a pre-processor symbol shared with head.S? > + > +/** > + * arm64_header_check_magic - Helper to check the arm64 image header. > + * > + * Returns non-zero if header is OK. > + */ > + > +static inline int arm64_header_check_magic(const struct arm64_image_header *h) > +{ > + if (!h) > + return 0; > + > + if (!h->text_offset) > + return 0; > + > + return (h->magic[0] == arm64_image_magic[0] > + && h->magic[1] == arm64_image_magic[1] > + && h->magic[2] == arm64_image_magic[2] > + && h->magic[3] == arm64_image_magic[3]); memcmp()? Or just define it as a 32bit value? I guess you skip the MZ prefix as its not present for !EFI? Could we check branch_code is non-zero, and text-offset points within image-size? We could check that this platform supports the page-size/endian config that this Image was built with... We get a message from the EFI stub if the page-size can't be supported, it would be nice to do the same here (as we can). (no idea if kexec-tool checks this stuff, it probably can't get at the id registers to know) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..4dd524ad6611 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c > @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ > +static void *image_load(struct kimage *image, > + char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len, > + char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len, > + char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len) > +{ > + struct kexec_buf kbuf; > + struct arm64_image_header *h = (struct arm64_image_header *)kernel; > + unsigned long text_offset; > + int ret; > + > + /* Load the kernel */ > + kbuf.image = image; > + kbuf.buf_min = 0; > + kbuf.buf_max = ULONG_MAX; > + kbuf.top_down = false; > + > + kbuf.buffer = kernel; > + kbuf.bufsz = kernel_len; > + kbuf.memsz = le64_to_cpu(h->image_size); > + text_offset = le64_to_cpu(h->text_offset); > + kbuf.buf_align = SZ_2M; > + /* Adjust kernel segment with TEXT_OFFSET */ > + kbuf.memsz += text_offset; > + > + ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf); > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > + image->arch.kern_segment = image->nr_segments - 1; You only seem to use kern_segment here, and in load_other_segments() called below. Could it not be a local variable passed in? Instead of arch-specific data we keep forever? > + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem += text_offset; > + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].memsz -= text_offset; > + image->start = image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem; > + > + pr_debug("Loaded kernel at 0x%lx bufsz=0x%lx memsz=0x%lx\n", > + image->segment[image->arch.kern_segment].mem, > + kbuf.bufsz, kbuf.memsz); > + > + /* Load additional data */ > + ret = load_other_segments(image, initrd, initrd_len, > + cmdline, cmdline_len); > + > +out: > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > +} Looks good, Thanks, James