Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 10:02:30 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To:     Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj@gmail.com>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        r.baldyga@hackerion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"
Message-ID: <20180502043230.GQ6014@localhost>
References: <2484918.HKVQc3yJkt@bear>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2484918.HKVQc3yJkt@bear>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
> 
> The pl330.c pause implementation violates the dmaengine requirement
> for no data loss, since it relies on the DMAKILL
> instruction.  However, DMAKILL discards in-flight data from the
> dma controller's fifo.  This is documented in the dma-330 manual
> and I have observed it with hardware doing device-to-memory burst
> transfers.  The discarded data may or may not show up in the
> residue count, depending on timing (resulting in data corruption
> effectively).

I am dropping the orignal patch for queue, so no need for revert patch.

-- 
~Vinod