Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp1300277imm; Wed, 2 May 2018 18:43:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoaeVZxleO1cO3Cs5Q5etr5M0CDw7jQ6cWhI1aesz1iYTHsLueCvmX1yVCyBqFkm2OTsTT/ X-Received: by 2002:a65:5244:: with SMTP id q4-v6mr17661509pgp.201.1525311817957; Wed, 02 May 2018 18:43:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525311817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CFSuPz9bqG0SNsyUIoil88xxdXtGrawbdeRfUXZOSeV5YHrGhx7AB9f+Hfg/HtP3+5 RJDmcduF8qwY+Xv7FQGR6FexhAqcYQguzZATw24d3QX+BweuG8lgtXESzA9a0/CaucPu MmfbzDpUU0kVDjo1lwmQe9OR4aL3vbR05TNopX994Qb1HnrILrIsvI8fDTfZgqn7r9I9 h3yFVg9g9fnXljDCZMcOOcC+vxudmxQAiTs16WF0KjDWZU0wm/QK2QM3MuS/1rA3c7/f N3mOl6a7Y9hPXU/wrB8U66rJ+ICup4kJqzackdXvzo7W4yTKU4wkh8FRxesD5c/1YHH3 o56g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :arc-authentication-results; bh=MIFYzloyRZ72ZFYfEpD7NTpc5w+gftzGjmsQK1IgvGg=; b=DGjaZIvyEN3YuS+tCPpg/7UhemGariMfeDBBsLj/N2yfldE9T4/clFBfhNipQjFmst sDpD5tYKKg/6CM5cApijks1yaYCWO5eQNa+lRk22tTaykRXJ2PMX5H7xh+u8ZPBtbivV BzhtqLjg23SPYOeaCD3VlF6YRVPcsAAvLUIwpzOF9h4BlEiNGiAtUQUgFQvMXJct74Ik cIY18eliQm5dj+S1FpcXN/OOSY5zpWXOQ0dQFDDLIZrnn5pIPFZpG5fF3ld6sFqXeZPE h8I0oxzhnO1N5nTmfzvl4AUpkBZHK4NUV7JTOcIAexe3ROebDX4xXrVzorWuG77l77kF egUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1-v6si12654966plh.375.2018.05.02.18.43.23; Wed, 02 May 2018 18:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751950AbeECBnN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 May 2018 21:43:13 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:51088 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751861AbeECBnK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2018 21:43:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w431dY1f030140 for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 21:43:10 -0400 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.106]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hqpntvk52-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 02 May 2018 21:43:09 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 3 May 2018 02:43:08 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 3 May 2018 02:43:05 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w431h5ee7864626; Thu, 3 May 2018 01:43:05 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAB411C0A4; Thu, 3 May 2018 02:34:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EA111C0A2; Thu, 3 May 2018 02:34:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.107.153]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 3 May 2018 02:34:38 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] evm: Don't update hmacs in user ns mounts From: Mimi Zohar To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 21:43:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r2mtybhf.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87r2mtybhf.fsf@xmission.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18050301-0040-0000-0000-000004355780 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18050301-0041-0000-0000-0000263977BC Message-Id: <1525311783.3238.19.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-03_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805030012 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 16:49 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Seth Forshee > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:32:35 +0100 > > The kernel should not calculate new hmacs for mounts done by > non-root users. Update evm_calc_hmac_or_hash() to refuse to > calculate new hmacs for mounts for non-init user namespaces. > > Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: James Morris > Cc: Mimi Zohar > Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee > Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman > --- > > Mimi this patch has been floating around for a while and it appears to > be the only piece missing from the vfs to make unprivileged mounts safe > (at least semantically). Do you want to merge this through your integrity > tree or should merge this through my userns tree? Matthew's EVM patches don't conflict with this change, so either way is fine. Mimi > > security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c > index a46fba322340..facf9cdd577d 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c > +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c > @@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry, > int size; > bool ima_present = false; > > - if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) > + if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) || > + inode->i_sb->s_user_ns != &init_user_ns) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > desc = init_desc(type);