Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
To:     subhashj@codeaurora.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
        vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
        linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/10] scsi: ufs: make sure all interrupts are processed
Date:   Thu,  3 May 2018 16:37:20 +0530
Message-Id: <faa728f587df5372dd78b3d012ed6bf78e92e883.1525343531.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1525341340.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
References: <cover.1525341340.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1525343531.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
References: <cover.1525343531.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>

As multiple requests are submitted to the ufs host controller in
parallel there could be instances where the command completion
interrupt arrives later for a request that is already processed
earlier as the corresponding doorbell was cleared when handling
the previous interrupt. Read the interrupt status in a loop after
processing the received interrupt to catch such interrupts and
handle it.

Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index c35a076..09b7a3f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5383,19 +5383,30 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba)
 	u32 intr_status, enabled_intr_status;
 	irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
 	struct ufs_hba *hba = __hba;
+	int retries = hba->nutrs;
 
 	spin_lock(hba->host->host_lock);
 	intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
-	enabled_intr_status =
-		intr_status & ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
 
-	if (intr_status)
-		ufshcd_writel(hba, intr_status, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+	/*
+	 * There could be max of hba->nutrs reqs in flight and in worst case
+	 * if the reqs get finished 1 by 1 after the interrupt status is
+	 * read, make sure we handle them by checking the interrupt status
+	 * again in a loop until we process all of the reqs before returning.
+	 */
+	do {
+		enabled_intr_status =
+			intr_status & ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
+		if (intr_status)
+			ufshcd_writel(hba, intr_status, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+		if (enabled_intr_status) {
+			ufshcd_sl_intr(hba, enabled_intr_status);
+			retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
+		}
+
+		intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
+	} while (intr_status && --retries);
 
-	if (enabled_intr_status) {
-		ufshcd_sl_intr(hba, enabled_intr_status);
-		retval = IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
 	spin_unlock(hba->host->host_lock);
 	return retval;
 }
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.