Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] clk: tegra20: Add DEV1/DEV2 OSC dividers
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
Cc:     linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180426235818.10018-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20180426235818.10018-2-digetx@gmail.com>
 <1524832404.6979.9.camel@ziswiler.com>
 <a8fc30b9-42ce-b29a-abc6-2867ebf4a9ac@gmail.com>
 <1524834018.6979.13.camel@ziswiler.com>
 <7c4e96ea-8bcf-1643-1b0f-29dc85b62b7b@gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=digetx@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 xsBNBFpX5TwBCADQhg+lBnTunWSPbP5I+rM9q6EKPm5fu2RbqyVAh/W3fRvLyghdb58Yrmjm
 KpDYUhBIZvAQoFLEL1IPAgJBtmPvemO1XUGPxfYNh/3BlcDFBAgERrI3BfA/6pk7SAFn8u84
 p+J1TW4rrPYcusfs44abJrn8CH0GZKt2AZIsGbGQ79O2HHXKHr9V95ZEPWH5AR0UtL6wxg6o
 O56UNG3rIzSL5getRDQW3yCtjcqM44mz6GPhSE2sxNgqureAbnzvr4/93ndOHtQUXPzzTrYB
 z/WqLGhPdx5Ouzn0Q0kSVCQiqeExlcQ7i7aKRRrELz/5/IXbCo2O+53twlX8xOps9iMfABEB
 AAHNIkRtaXRyeSBPc2lwZW5rbyA8ZGlnZXR4QGdtYWlsLmNvbT7CwJQEEwEIAD4WIQSczHcO
 3uc4K1eb3yvTNNaPsNRzvAUCWlflPAIbAwUJA8JnAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX
 gAAKCRDTNNaPsNRzvFjTCACqAh1M9/YPq73/ai5h2ExDquTgJnjegL8KL2yHL3G+XINwzN5E
 nPI7esoYm+zVWDJbv3UuRqylpookLNSRA01yyvkaMcipB/B128UnqmUiGRqezj9QE20yIauo
 uHRuwHPE2q+UkfUhRX9iuOaEyQtZDiCa0myMjmRkJ+Z8ZetclEPG8dYZu47w04phuMlu1QAt
 a0gkZOaMKvXgj21ushALS6nYnvm7HiIPQXfnEXThartatRvFdmbG4PCn0IoICkQBizwJtXrL
 HEjELIFap0M8krVJlUoZTFaZnaZkGpUDWikeFtAuie2KuIxmVBYPM4X7pM3eP3AVvIPGS7EE
 UUFuzsBNBFpX5TwBCADFNDou220thijaLLGaQsebWjzc/gPRxMixIpk856MRyRaQin+IbGD6
 YskMb5ZSD3nS88LIKNfY4MMH0LwfYztI++ICG2vdFLkbBt78E+LqEa+kZ9072l4W5KO3mWQo
 +jMfxXbpgGlc7iuEReDgl8iyZ27r51kSW665CYvvu2YJhLqgdj6QM1lN2D1UnhEhkkU+pRAj
 1rJVOxdfJaQNQS4+204p3TrURovzNGkN/brqakpNIcqGOAGQqb8F0tuwwuP7ERq/BzDNkbdr
 qJOrVC/wkHRq1jfabQczWKf8MwYOvivR3HY8d3CpSQxmUXDtdOWfg0XGm1dxYnVfqPjuJaZt
 ABEBAAHCwHwEGAEIACYWIQSczHcO3uc4K1eb3yvTNNaPsNRzvAUCWlflPAIbDAUJA8JnAAAK
 CRDTNNaPsNRzvJzuB/9d+sxcwHbO8ZDcgaLX9N+bXFqN9fIRVmBUyWa+qqTSREA4uVAtYcRT
 lfPE2OQ7aMFxaYPwo+/z5SLpu8HcEhN/FG9uIkfYwK0mdCO0vgvlfvBJm4VHe7C6vyAeEPJQ
 DKbBvdgeqFqO+PsLkk2sawF/9sontMJ5iFfjNDj4UeAo4VsdlduTBZv5hHFvIbv/p7jKH6OT
 90FsgUSVbShh7SH5OzAcgqSy4kxuS1AHizWo6P3f9vei987LZWTyhuEuhJsOfivDsjKIq7qQ
 c5eR+JJtyLEA0Jt4cQGhpzHtWB0yB3XxXzHVa4QUp00BNVWyiJ/t9JHT4S5mdyLfcKm7ddc9
Message-ID: <440e71db-cd0b-c4d8-eb24-ac8ebec9ae75@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 15:02:36 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7c4e96ea-8bcf-1643-1b0f-29dc85b62b7b@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03.05.2018 14:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 27.04.2018 16:00, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 15:54 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Hi Marcel,
>>>
>>> On 27.04.2018 15:33,  Ziswiler wrote:
>>>> Hi Dmitry
>>>>
>>>> Isn't the CLK_RST_CONTROLLER_MISC_CLK_ENB_0 the other way around
>>>> e.g.
>>>> DEV1_OSC_DIV_SEL at bit 23:22 and DEV2_OSC_DIV_SEL at 21:20?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 02:58 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> CDEV1/CDEV2 clocks could have corresponding oscillator clock
>>>>> divider
>>>>> as
>>>>> a parent. Add these dividers in order to be able to provide that
>>>>> parent
>>>>> option.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-
>>>>> tegra20.c
>>>>> index 0ee56dd04cec..16cf4108f2ff 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>>>>>  #include "clk.h"
>>>>>  #include "clk-id.h"
>>>>>  
>>>>> +#define MISC_CLK_ENB 0x48
>>>>> +
>>>>>  #define OSC_CTRL 0x50
>>>>>  #define OSC_CTRL_OSC_FREQ_MASK (3<<30)
>>>>>  #define OSC_CTRL_OSC_FREQ_13MHZ (0<<30)
>>>>> @@ -831,6 +833,16 @@ static void __init
>>>>> tegra20_periph_clk_init(void)
>>>>>  				    periph_clk_enb_refcnt);
>>>>>  	clks[TEGRA20_CLK_PEX] = clk;
>>>>>  
>>>>> +	/* cdev1 OSC divider */
>>>>> +	clk_register_divider(NULL, "cdev1_osc_div", "clk_m",
>>>>> +			     0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 20, 2,
>>>>
>>>> So it would be:
>>>>
>>>> +			     0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 22, 2,
>>>>
>>>>> +			     CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* cdev2 OSC divider */
>>>>> +	clk_register_divider(NULL, "cdev2_osc_div", "clk_m",
>>>>> +			     0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 22, 2,
>>>>
>>>> And:
>>>>
>>>> +			     0, clk_base + MISC_CLK_ENB, 20, 2,
>>>>
>>>>> +			     CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO, NULL);
>>>>> +
>>>>>  	/* cdev1 */
>>>>>  	clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "cdev1_fixed", NULL,
>>>>> 0,
>>>>> 26000000);
>>>>>  	clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_gate("cdev1",
>>>>> "cdev1_fixed",
>>>>> 0,
>>>
>>> Indeed, good catch! I'll wait for more comments and then re-spin
>>> patchset with
>>> the fix. Thank you.
>>
>> You are very welcome. Thank you!
>>
>> Other than that it all looks proper and works fine at least in the
>> configuration we use on Colibri T20. So you may add my reviewed and
>> tested bys to the whole series:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>
>> Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>
> 
> Marcel, you previously mentioned that reverting of your DT patch works for the
> Colibri now. Does that reverting also work for the 4.17 kernel? If yes, I may
> add stable tag to the revert-patch to get back paz00 working with 4.17. If it's
> not working, we should figure out why pll_p_out4 is getting disabled as it
> should be a distinct issue.

Oh, I just found that Thierry already asked to get this patches included into
4.17. Anyway would be nice to know if a sole DT revert works with 4.17 for you.