Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180503035931.22439-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
 <20180503035931.22439-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <CAKgT0UdocfEm9oXZ1dkEMari8m3OA4uVTrYg45uj9fk2V41bxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGM2rea3XXJ7OqGeAdexyOUb1_7W_84t5HAb_hp7Rb=TkTM86Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKgT0UfNBugQywBZuepUJ6deEYsSWmTw3b6VbQBJLn-kKXe7ng@mail.gmail.com> <50c9ac34-3971-ac1b-0b5e-1bfa004fd4cf@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <50c9ac34-3971-ac1b-0b5e-1bfa004fd4cf@oracle.com>
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 03 May 2018 14:23:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGM2reZULTOcK+_VypXJjkkCNZbALuR_FS-t7ix-Wpq6AKXdjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: release lock for the duration of ixgbe_suspend_close()
To:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc:     alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hi Pavel, you might want to pull lock optimization out of this patch
series.
> The parallelization by itself is valuable, and optimizations for
individual
> devices including locks can come later.

Hi Steve,

Yes, I will pull this patch out of the series. Thank you for the suggestion.

Pavel