Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 22:29:28 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Gary R Hook <ghook@amd.com>
Cc:     Gary R Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/amd - Update the PASID information printed to
 the system log
Message-ID: <20180503202928.GZ15462@8bytes.org>
References: <152520429853.30928.9793486018349326103.stgit@taos>
 <152520437211.30928.8410126837908568791.stgit@taos>
 <20180503135706.nypxlwlt7jhqhhum@8bytes.org>
 <526f3331-610f-9556-1d6d-f595d689b6de@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <526f3331-610f-9556-1d6d-f595d689b6de@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:09:18PM -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
> Yes, I didn't quite get this right. Both values should be passed along. Or
> perhaps the entire event could be passed in and decoded by
> amd_iommu_report_page_fault()?

You already pass in the flags, you can chose the correct message by
looking at the GN flag there and treat the value as a domid or a pasid.


	Joerg