Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 4 May 2018 07:42:17 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "w@1wt.eu" <w@1wt.eu>,
        "julia.lawall@lip6.fr" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
Message-ID: <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20180501163818.GD1468@sasha-vm>
 <20180501194450.GD10479@thunk.org>
 <20180501200019.GA7397@sasha-vm>
 <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org>
 <20180501211551.GI2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAKMK7uHjA27K8y-kwYFyhLy3cSkJJw8Oe1gP=3hZXdfxcWAcNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm>
 <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org>
 <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="soWJpSPh+l8Y6Fy7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--soWJpSPh+l8Y6Fy7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:52:29PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> As for -next, me and others stopped reporting bugs in it, because when we do
> we tend to get flamed for the "noise". Is anyone aware (or cares) that mips
> and nds32 images don't build ? Soaking clothes in an empty bathtub won't make
> them wet, and bugs in code which no one builds, much less tests or uses, won't
> be found.

You've been flamed for testing -next?  That's not been my experience and
frankly it's pretty horrifying that it's happening.  Testing is pretty
much the whole point of -next existing in the first place so you have to
wonder why people are putting their trees there if they don't want
testing.  I have seen a few issues with people reporting bugs on old
versions of -next but otherwise...

--soWJpSPh+l8Y6Fy7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlrrkEYACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9D6aAf/aWjbgLYQ25BOZg7Np2lo4EMzezJlcssRLQiCtkGkfdF8gyl/ZOJ2FokB
RPhuUzekpRnqp8uCZi1GjTPPEU5efGBlYbdxISDDU6Rc5zCRqz0w48lq0XJMLiEH
+Vo5MkdxKjTovaZ1/pz7VOk4dgv/cKdgRuKxzsMTX+rRsdzaBxACSIjWL7XCPxy7
17UaZSWkcjmO8AEkJe6oRoXOx7hrvT6SViX/+TQ7wrXzSrkL29n9/CG7MNR0TTUi
EnIB4P/PcZvHDqPMskzgD8Taf0zNGmQGyfGxd4vgC9V3u7RCzayUUQ9OI3jrpASo
tgKZVC1MOdMTB2GpgMekBFkGLEYHNw==
=uYX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--soWJpSPh+l8Y6Fy7--