Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp215794imm; Fri, 4 May 2018 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrvefjz3QEYWFsfSPTRtwSHlCXBrB+a2agxHYrGVl8uU8IJ59+r00af5lnoMw1zwr+D2CW1 X-Received: by 10.98.106.10 with SMTP id f10mr27013835pfc.99.1525450159446; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525450159; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gK8EMLG8IKvvQR0YBIPvckZfQiuZoxq0BT2BV4crSmtuDPZ216PASLoGagcmiYKIth YQM7iwDRJ1SoxaFoao8vZgEr7BIiLkSJfH8C0IQJiG5AFIGezRtrinrkSu8PNMLQ5w5x 6tYIvMDSjR/98kG5VEGnhipEQHx8aPR5Rm6E9rM6PYtz4I2B1rxJmyrhnS9DqgYXmgnC OvAIv4/uwo+GaWqEWg+WgFUSzxFa3teL1qjUxOK0J+jsm6dlS1mNcVHRL+A3bSLQYD5A 5NpO5sZZ0/4/VFvWo/b4rTPNqZeHr83kvuYu7Z2BarRF2iXG+VaMjCb0TXt7rgv4MybF 4bzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:arc-authentication-results; bh=3tqVqo3gqSpnI2EkePP9j9tlF4df02D0mo1MXHUxMgM=; b=ljBiFJsFNpj0oh0MNTQS5vNWrdgpV+p8xw6v5WGh0Q2DmN6DK0N/hQ9xs7JflX+1gy 3AZFJeCiK5YA861vYP6mnrgePp7gKO/6A9Dlxn4FLVJ1bP3CaigZQiAVG8mRgkl+Lw57 ONu/YAtse4rB1H+voLPdbo5IaNuN9H25I6Gb6djqPBHiZw3RYfL/1hFWyJnWKQ+wL6ko /xgyf4+TNxqGsF41Q/Q0xrYokf0VM4NIknDV2kqc9q2o1kDfBATcISvtS/14brFPwuOS 5i6vjcKoXglEQqJx/x4CKX7GWHicSUoH7siYTcMc60OvC4dftNoQqhFrqW1cRuxMWQ1l PpUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e14-v6si2136501pgv.516.2018.05.04.09.09.05; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751613AbeEDQIp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 May 2018 12:08:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com ([74.125.82.194]:43326 "EHLO mail-ot0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751196AbeEDQIm (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 12:08:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ot0-f194.google.com with SMTP id y10-v6so25029363otg.10 for ; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:08:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3tqVqo3gqSpnI2EkePP9j9tlF4df02D0mo1MXHUxMgM=; b=DicHrUy5ZcuFaFtfRjG10RuvdTgTW3nYIfPXEyGVdjOf6V42PSy4NFvZYRVE4Jrw9E S6UPd+r8ZxsB9FvCV2+jdc7tsQoWou1weJffoMhuRRFZuSiLXlU0VaxLfUQUbobpHalJ II4E8XyvabhabfeBVsTtocSPmX79B+rptUTXU7OxaOsM8PppBtiCiGFcu4OcaJUXtY/7 LotPE/dh/0eDG0MNact1hZBg542foERjfUeVViGizSBaYHx/yUjtFkEaHp42/Xn9vv4t 8wm0ujahtPY5m/8iEUX6FpT8zaw8Cs7oQIHmubSR9uzBC49+Jwq0gM/Vjrk0Kq1Qo4HB 15qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAo+j3l32Z66I2vw+MAJjQuiLjsJ9WGUdh/Bctw0cy5TAA6eHcK M5/FGyNhc/z+YjKQSN7qW/DyQW0aNEKhHu2b8zClWg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1535:: with SMTP id u50-v6mr21547791otf.197.1525450120975; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:08:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:5995:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2018 09:08:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <05b0fcf2-7670-101e-d4ab-1f656ff6b02f@gmail.com> References: <1523431317-30612-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> <05b0fcf2-7670-101e-d4ab-1f656ff6b02f@gmail.com> From: Daniel Vacek Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 18:08:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64 To: Jia He Cc: Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Wei Yang , Kees Cook , Laura Abbott , Vladimir Murzin , Philip Derrin , AKASHI Takahiro , James Morse , Steve Capper , Pavel Tatashin , Gioh Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Kemi Wang , Petr Tesarik , YASUAKI ISHIMATSU , Andrey Ryabinin , Nikolay Borisov , Daniel Jordan , Eugeniu Rosca , linux-arm-kernel , open list , Linux-MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Jia He wrote: > Ping > > Sorry if I am a little bit verbose, but it can speedup the arm64 booting > time indeed. I'm wondering, ain't simple enabling of config DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT provide even better speed-up? If that is the case then it seems like this series is not needed at all, right? I am not sure why is this config optional. It looks like it could be enabled by default or even unconditionally considering that with commit c9e97a1997fb ("mm: initialize pages on demand during boot") the deferred code is statically disabled after all the pages are initialized. --nX > > -- > Cheers, > Jia > > > On 4/11/2018 3:21 PM, Jia He Wrote: >> >> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >> where possible") tried to optimize the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But >> there is still some room for improvement. >> >> Patch 1 introduce new config to make codes more generic >> Patch 2 remain the memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm and arm64 >> Patch 3 optimizes the memblock_next_valid_pfn() >> Patch 4~6 optimizes the early_pfn_valid() >> >> As for the performance improvement, after this set, I can see the time >> overhead of memmap_init() is reduced from 41313 us to 24389 us in my >> armv8a server(QDF2400 with 96G memory). >> >> Without this patchset: >> [ 117.113677] before memmap_init >> [ 117.118195] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 4518 us >> >> [ 117.121446] before memmap_init >> [ 117.154992] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 33546 us >> >> [ 117.158241] before memmap_init >> [ 117.161490] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 3249 us >>>>> totally takes 41313 us >> >> With this patchset: >> [ 123.222962] before memmap_init >> [ 123.226819] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 3857 >> >> [ 123.230070] before memmap_init >> [ 123.247354] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 17284 >> >> [ 123.250604] before memmap_init >> [ 123.253852] after memmap_init >>>>> >>>>> memmap_init takes 3248 >>>>> totally takes 24389 us >> >> Attached the memblock region information in my server. >> [ 86.956758] Zone ranges: >> [ 86.959452] DMA [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x00000000ffffffff] >> [ 86.966041] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x00000017ffffffff] >> [ 86.972631] Movable zone start for each node >> [ 86.977179] Early memory node ranges >> [ 86.980985] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000200000-0x000000000021ffff] >> [ 86.987666] node 0: [mem 0x0000000000820000-0x000000000307ffff] >> [ 86.994348] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003080000-0x000000000308ffff] >> [ 87.001029] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003090000-0x00000000031fffff] >> [ 87.007710] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003200000-0x00000000033fffff] >> [ 87.014392] node 0: [mem 0x0000000003410000-0x000000000563ffff] >> [ 87.021073] node 0: [mem 0x0000000005640000-0x000000000567ffff] >> [ 87.027754] node 0: [mem 0x0000000005680000-0x00000000056dffff] >> [ 87.034435] node 0: [mem 0x00000000056e0000-0x00000000086fffff] >> [ 87.041117] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008700000-0x000000000871ffff] >> [ 87.047798] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008720000-0x000000000894ffff] >> [ 87.054479] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008950000-0x0000000008baffff] >> [ 87.061161] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008bb0000-0x0000000008bcffff] >> [ 87.067842] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008bd0000-0x0000000008c4ffff] >> [ 87.074524] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008c50000-0x0000000008e2ffff] >> [ 87.081205] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008e30000-0x0000000008e4ffff] >> [ 87.087886] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008e50000-0x0000000008fcffff] >> [ 87.094568] node 0: [mem 0x0000000008fd0000-0x000000000910ffff] >> [ 87.101249] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009110000-0x00000000092effff] >> [ 87.107930] node 0: [mem 0x00000000092f0000-0x000000000930ffff] >> [ 87.114612] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009310000-0x000000000963ffff] >> [ 87.121293] node 0: [mem 0x0000000009640000-0x000000000e61ffff] >> [ 87.127975] node 0: [mem 0x000000000e620000-0x000000000e64ffff] >> [ 87.134657] node 0: [mem 0x000000000e650000-0x000000000fffffff] >> [ 87.141338] node 0: [mem 0x0000000010800000-0x0000000017feffff] >> [ 87.148019] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c000000-0x000000001c00ffff] >> [ 87.154701] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c010000-0x000000001c7fffff] >> [ 87.161383] node 0: [mem 0x000000001c810000-0x000000007efbffff] >> [ 87.168064] node 0: [mem 0x000000007efc0000-0x000000007efdffff] >> [ 87.174746] node 0: [mem 0x000000007efe0000-0x000000007efeffff] >> [ 87.181427] node 0: [mem 0x000000007eff0000-0x000000007effffff] >> [ 87.188108] node 0: [mem 0x000000007f000000-0x00000017ffffffff] >> [ 87.194791] Initmem setup node 0 [mem >> 0x0000000000200000-0x00000017ffffffff] >> >> Changelog: >> V8: - introduce new config and move generic code to early_pfn.h >> - optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn as suggested by Matthew Wilcox >> V7: - fix i386 compilation error. refine the commit description >> V6: - simplify the codes, move arm/arm64 common codes to one file. >> - refine patches as suggested by Danial Vacek and Ard Biesheuvel >> V5: - further refining as suggested by Danial Vacek. Make codes >> arm/arm64 more arch specific >> V4: - refine patches as suggested by Danial Vacek and Wei Yang >> - optimized on arm besides arm64 >> V3: - fix 2 issues reported by kbuild test robot >> V2: - rebase to mmotm latest >> - remain memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm64 >> - refine memblock_search_pfn_regions and pfn_valid_region >> >> Jia He (6): >> arm: arm64: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID >> mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm/arm64 >> arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in >> memblock_next_valid_pfn() >> mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions() >> arm: arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region() >> mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid() >> >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 +++ >> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 1 + >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 +++ >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 1 + >> include/linux/early_pfn.h | 79 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++ >> include/linux/mmzone.h | 18 ++++++++++- >> mm/Kconfig | 3 ++ >> mm/memblock.c | 9 ++++++ >> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 ++- >> 10 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 include/linux/early_pfn.h >> >