Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp277665imm; Fri, 4 May 2018 10:08:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqKHY1Y4wDUa/LOdfGvRtTnxfLtxJXEU6u8lwxBVkrjJLD7LM712oNUUbrOCk9Uyv6s6nr+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb93:: with SMTP id m19-v6mr8919769pls.74.1525453701696; Fri, 04 May 2018 10:08:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525453701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uQKpngd2uI85DRvDPBVtkYdtgS+Ahwv6iXfjmPmfnRNCcxlBIH7OhOOVQJ/pt0YT/q /9l75MLyhGT2EdvGVXSO10RtvBI7sMTHL4Ev88l+q7tMwnGyuiDoLdy7d08msIi/CfJv Y7PJbhBgJL84C7THfI9CpqLWMdvx8moaoeTCd/Z618BgRHCo07etESXeLWRgNoLWeoj1 QuT+WTdVvOwi8ggfyLZLIWiT6hZUfz3NEQTe2fiq9ZY0ILV6hfmad0TNjaAEoVm2NmkT GabZ8lBCN76G/7buD4YcWNaXTQJp2OyKLAnSG4+1hFBQ6vM/VyV22NR1MpUMoeLg49L3 1DQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=kwEXS6pHvwFwJ4qbxznd+pcaEYnyMF3ICjPhqyrjY/I=; b=HhMJ9uchHdhVJSPzU/jN0eVaP97Etbep/AQ5gcMKgdhj94oCudAM94lVq0eZ2sSm+W UAXVe8uywFsf7c3U+MLaDGrAVM5gVDdXgLHAGsLPWK4p86XgudfB45SlcUGR4MYbtC4C d/MlHiSF0SL+GrDVoLd+/8DMMDzNOT+Uhuit5n2UZwycTLQ8qbgv7oF+f3HMXWeBmIEr MvJunBh86Jk4sesmOaEguh2WeXga7+XTh/W9e2G9UUDogUur109MORLruE7nw/sJyz0h 8/aJXGcQ1f44BHrId9TSPgiNpHJnI/vJajEib96NFj3Qrfl63Rb0DK96mwS3OViXoE6r YaWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k33-v6si16314005pld.100.2018.05.04.10.08.07; Fri, 04 May 2018 10:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751674AbeEDRHu (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 May 2018 13:07:50 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:35722 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751511AbeEDRHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 13:07:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (67.110.78.66.ptr.us.xo.net [67.110.78.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2CAF13416BBF; Fri, 4 May 2018 10:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 13:07:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20180504.130747.817364093811964755.davem@davemloft.net> To: neilb@suse.com Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Assorted rhashtable fixes and cleanups From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <152540595840.18473.11298241115621799037.stgit@noble> References: <152540595840.18473.11298241115621799037.stgit@noble> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 04 May 2018 10:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: NeilBrown Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 13:54:14 +1000 > This series contains some bugfixes, mostly minor though one > is worthy of a stable backport I think - tagged with Fixes and Cc: stable. > > Then there are improvements to walking, which have been discussed > to some degree already. > Finally a code simplification which I think is correct... Please do not mix bug fixes and features or improvements. Please target the serious bug fixes for 'net' and then you can target the features and improvements for 'net-next'. This is especially important if you want a change queued up for -stable, as the change must first go into 'net' for that to happen. Thank you.