Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 4 May 2018 19:35:42 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, "w@1wt.eu" <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
Message-ID: <20180504233542.GM29205@thunk.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
        "w@1wt.eu" <w@1wt.eu>
References: <20180503165446.GB30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20180503173422.GR18390@sasha-vm>
 <20180503182039.GC30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <8669.1525427874@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <87fu377gbu.fsf@intel.com>
 <20180504130932.GI29205@thunk.org>
 <20180504174055.GF4649@kroah.com>
 <20180504211317.GK29205@thunk.org>
 <1525469881.4114.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <20180504215111.GX18390@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180504215111.GX18390@sasha-vm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
> my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.

It's not a matter "moving this it's own tag", but creating a new tag
--- because what is in the docs is a lie.  It does not describe what
we do today.  And current practice is the reality, not what is in the
docs.

As to whether we should create a new tag to support explicit
dependencies, I'll leave that between you and Greg K-H and the rest of
the stable maintainers.  :-)

						- Ted