Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp1180502imm; Sat, 5 May 2018 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq7VZ16ZkiVPedRhxddM6wcYLJKybtWIgB++jhOpGDTTxJfPlIrqkzSv7BoSAV8UcOQ1o8l X-Received: by 2002:a63:751d:: with SMTP id q29-v6mr25407714pgc.269.1525526915133; Sat, 05 May 2018 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525526915; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LB9JuxEzjfN9YaTPM9i+La4UAGWU2b0ISl0dFbpcU9O88G/oO3HNMTPCJ0b2yd4fuj 7FO0okVbdJJdBfFvyJJLsu4YWXG++KEFa7OxckPuFkWblck8TDDJh9urk7BXRV6yC+9r vx1SByplP24Xnwn0GOFYSXOmcSlsG51y+2R6+pVyKJhzt62XTCJ+BffZCGc1uDAGGxMf GgeV7TmyaWpyQbF/a+jjxCBqF+ng20hf5b1HAoDHlP2zuFp6tHXPL4XbWf9uyMFLm9iw hW2jTmSaBH7D+ZWB28O565N0Xcb6zWUuZCyhA8yfsqQJMzRwqrTOThcTDIA1Nry8aAFS FqIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=YXZbFSLr0x48MMcGRgb8mbucgVJpAnz8UL5UDSABatM=; b=w+gHIrGqlnmVII94Yd5E8yrhC0iEOYeHQbKQ61Djy/19Cq2pzWEn3kL2S1o5Jfwect 5l1qRPhpqkP77iIg5ZMTT5Fpv/4CFu2BTul/sWBamU93+LCNQ27FTE0Zt/Mxwt0ZM10/ q0y5mjdxfdEBYO3cWcBrxa3Ra8nzbVmCy44LssohWhN2tR59d6o16Bh21S5oEmH/Xrmy U31Cz3di1jrVWi1GkYaSeVxC1U49HSXaqIRaxQJHbnu8a8bxm/1WezNF9tiqo0YZIpVw ubmexCUDa3wxpxKLU3rtYQfiZ1N1YtVYWLPQUgDiNQfd9zLnsKY3zOzDys4DwfoYb6S/ APZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=W/ryZJJ4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a68-v6si18340499pli.158.2018.05.05.06.28.21; Sat, 05 May 2018 06:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=W/ryZJJ4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751751AbeEEN15 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 5 May 2018 09:27:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:51713 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbeEEN1z (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2018 09:27:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id j4so7788805wme.1 for ; Sat, 05 May 2018 06:27:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YXZbFSLr0x48MMcGRgb8mbucgVJpAnz8UL5UDSABatM=; b=W/ryZJJ4JOWAcfv/Xrarh1Pay7NpW4xp1MX96//YYKJ6JEJDtTezpJ5gRqMF+Dyype CtLmCOopkxzkgsmgIg+1wvHRiVfGJ6HNwgeGxtKNDCfexJGikI2hNjRifc9WG2t5GF4t LWYdWwg14QMGA6Z07n5HGOYNlSgFGqbCXDUBVhBIeq+Un2qLcAZDx1a6ve7wJWiCExst vDd6mRRZxXJzObQRxXyaufPheZ1dpPa7eTaeu1ltGAvk3TJ+Wsf6+28YgCCwKNe+AJAk Ryc5YBTeVsHAAz4+QDeYpruPDSvoVC5hfBevoWJxNN9OAA9XNaKE9r80SW5KHixz+6sO C4+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YXZbFSLr0x48MMcGRgb8mbucgVJpAnz8UL5UDSABatM=; b=tZiyje5SwNSFpDfCe5emf93YLH2mt+m0uXY7jdAhR5ZBIY7vZ2lOqQTtvmre8f/CWx 97iHdon7z8KGaO17B2miA+ExfWfopycefazY8KedXMiF8r8rD5upqnjkhtdX0xKY+jmt fGi9eF0Xs6DOnqGIaSLnwJo3kMGGNzsn/mobA2a2OcM6jvtkAsO3I08D9YOUjILRGm3S 17wCbXAJDwvsK/+8SkbFGELidz8q3ewj+IeS6R/ijnN71VRmvFaDDFXjxFEcw5jblBog qSAyg6b06oSQyE3XzSJFnkkYaad9+BMHRufapp7nDLup7Eyr+6gY62V2AGXfBqK8zWOc gzww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAEX78VyQpit6FK2lxL20dsZ10mIKd0klZc2KY+czo0XW/YiTMm A7Wiy/8qroFVgaSqhiWshBo= X-Received: by 10.28.158.144 with SMTP id h138mr20380971wme.33.1525526874579; Sat, 05 May 2018 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7-v6sm9605670wrm.35.2018.05.05.06.27.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 May 2018 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 15:27:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Boqun Feng Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, will.deacon@arm.com Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Message-ID: <20180505132751.gwzu2vbzibr2risd@gmail.com> References: <20180504173937.25300-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20180504180105.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180504180909.dnhfflibjwywnm4l@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20180505081100.nsyrqrpzq2vd27bk@gmail.com> <20180505084721.GA32344@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180505090403.p2ywuen42rnlwizq@gmail.com> <20180505093829.xfylnedwd5nonhae@gmail.com> <20180505101609.5wb56j4mspjkokmw@tardis> <20180505103550.s7xsnto7tgppkmle@gmail.com> <20180505112817.ihrb726i37bwm4cj@tardis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180505112817.ihrb726i37bwm4cj@tardis> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Boqun Feng wrote: > > May I suggest the patch below? No change in functionality, but it documents the > > lack of the cmpxchg_release() APIs and maps them explicitly to the full cmpxchg() > > version. (Which the generic code does now in a rather roundabout way.) > > > > Hmm.. cmpxchg_release() is actually lwsync() + cmpxchg_relaxed(), but > you just make it sync() + cmpxchg_relaxed() + sync() with the fallback, > and sync() is much heavier, so I don't think the fallback is correct. Indeed! The bit I missed previously is that PowerPC provides its own __atomic_op_release() method: #define __atomic_op_release(op, args...) \ ({ \ __asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); \ op##_relaxed(args); \ }) ... which maps to LWSYNC as you say, and my patch made that worse. > I think maybe you can move powerpc's __atomic_op_{acqurie,release}() > from atomic.h to cmpxchg.h (in arch/powerpc/include/asm), and > > #define cmpxchg_release __atomic_op_release(cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__); > #define cmpxchg64_release __atomic_op_release(cmpxchg64, __VA_ARGS__); > > I put a diff below to say what I mean (untested). > > > Also, the change to arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h has no functional effect > > right now either, but should anyone add a _relaxed() variant in the future, with > > this change atomic_cmpxchg_release() and atomic64_cmpxchg_release() will pick that > > up automatically. > > > > You mean with your other modification in include/linux/atomic.h, right? > Because with the unmodified include/linux/atomic.h, we already pick that > autmatically. If so, I think that's fine. > > Here is the diff for the modification for cmpxchg_release(), the idea is > we generate them in asm/cmpxchg.h other than linux/atomic.h for ppc, so > we keep the new linux/atomic.h working. Because if I understand > correctly, the next linux/atomic.h only accepts that > > 1) architecture only defines fully ordered primitives > > or > > 2) architecture only defines _relaxed primitives > > or > > 3) architecture defines all four (fully, _relaxed, _acquire, > _release) primitives > > So powerpc needs to define all four primitives in its only > asm/cmpxchg.h. Correct, although the new logic is still RFC, PeterZ didn't like the first version I proposed and might NAK them. Thanks for the patch - I have created the patch below from it and added your Signed-off-by. The only change I made beyond a trivial build fix is that I also added the release atomics variants explicitly: +#define atomic_cmpxchg_release(v, o, n) \ + cmpxchg_release(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) +#define atomic64_cmpxchg_release(v, o, n) \ + cmpxchg_release(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) It has passed a PowerPC cross-build test here, but no runtime tests. Does this patch look good to you? (Still subject to PeterZ's Ack/NAK.) Thanks, Ingo ======================> From: Boqun Feng Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 19:28:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Move PowerPC's __op_{acqurie,release}() from atomic.h to cmpxchg.h (in arch/powerpc/include/asm), plus use them to define these two methods: #define cmpxchg_release __op_release(cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__); #define cmpxchg64_release __op_release(cmpxchg64, __VA_ARGS__); ... the idea is to generate all these methods in cmpxchg.h and to define the full array of atomic primitives, including the cmpxchg_release() methods which were defined by the generic code before. Also define the atomic[64]_() variants explicitly. This ensures that all these low level cmpxchg APIs are defined in PowerPC headers, with no generic header fallbacks. No change in functionality or code generation. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: dvyukov@google.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180505112817.ihrb726i37bwm4cj@tardis Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h | 22 ++++------------------ arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h index 682b3e6a1e21..4e06955ec10f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h @@ -13,24 +13,6 @@ #define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } -/* - * Since *_return_relaxed and {cmp}xchg_relaxed are implemented with - * a "bne-" instruction at the end, so an isync is enough as a acquire barrier - * on the platform without lwsync. - */ -#define __atomic_op_acquire(op, args...) \ -({ \ - typeof(op##_relaxed(args)) __ret = op##_relaxed(args); \ - __asm__ __volatile__(PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); \ - __ret; \ -}) - -#define __atomic_op_release(op, args...) \ -({ \ - __asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); \ - op##_relaxed(args); \ -}) - static __inline__ int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) { int t; @@ -213,6 +195,8 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_dec_return_relaxed(atomic_t *v) cmpxchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) #define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(v, o, n) \ cmpxchg_acquire(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) +#define atomic_cmpxchg_release(v, o, n) \ + cmpxchg_release(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) #define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new)) #define atomic_xchg_relaxed(v, new) xchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (new)) @@ -519,6 +503,8 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v) cmpxchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) #define atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(v, o, n) \ cmpxchg_acquire(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) +#define atomic64_cmpxchg_release(v, o, n) \ + cmpxchg_release(&((v)->counter), (o), (n)) #define atomic64_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new)) #define atomic64_xchg_relaxed(v, new) xchg_relaxed(&((v)->counter), (new)) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h index 9b001f1f6b32..e27a612b957f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h @@ -8,6 +8,24 @@ #include #include +/* + * Since *_return_relaxed and {cmp}xchg_relaxed are implemented with + * a "bne-" instruction at the end, so an isync is enough as a acquire barrier + * on the platform without lwsync. + */ +#define __atomic_op_acquire(op, args...) \ +({ \ + typeof(op##_relaxed(args)) __ret = op##_relaxed(args); \ + __asm__ __volatile__(PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); \ + __ret; \ +}) + +#define __atomic_op_release(op, args...) \ +({ \ + __asm__ __volatile__(PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER "" : : : "memory"); \ + op##_relaxed(args); \ +}) + #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN #define BITOFF_CAL(size, off) ((sizeof(u32) - size - off) * BITS_PER_BYTE) #else @@ -512,6 +530,9 @@ __cmpxchg_acquire(void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new, (unsigned long)_o_, (unsigned long)_n_, \ sizeof(*(ptr))); \ }) + +#define cmpxchg_release(...) __atomic_op_release(cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__) + #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 #define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \ ({ \ @@ -533,6 +554,9 @@ __cmpxchg_acquire(void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new, BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*(ptr)) != 8); \ cmpxchg_acquire((ptr), (o), (n)); \ }) + +#define cmpxchg64_release(...) __atomic_op_release(cmpxchg64, __VA_ARGS__) + #else #include #define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) __cmpxchg64_local_generic((ptr), (o), (n))