Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 6 May 2018 20:24:30 +0200
From:   Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes
Message-ID: <20180506182430.GB19628@grmbl.mre>
References: <1524248223-393618-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <20180424214104-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20180503034529.GA16676@grmbl.mre>
 <20180503222702-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180503222702-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (Thu) 03 May 2018 [22:28:32], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:45:29AM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
> > (apologies if you received a dup)
> > 
> > On (Tue) 24 Apr 2018 [21:41:29], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq.
> > > > Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec.  And while
> > > > going over it I saw that error handling is also broken -
> > > > failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail.
> > > > 
> > > > Lightly tested.
> > > 
> > > Amit - any feedback before I push these patches?
> > 
> > The changes look good spec-wise.
> > 
> > There are a bunch of tests in avocado-vt that test virtio-console
> > functionality.  Can you give those a try before pushing?
> > 
> > 		Amit
> 
> I pushed before I did that test, will try to find the time later.  BTW
> do you still want to be on the maintainers list?

Yes, I want to be on the maintainers list; but won't mind
co-maintainers.  The recent changes seem to be spec-related, and I'd
expect you to have a good handle on that anyway.

		Amit
-- 
http://amitshah.net/