Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2536707imm; Sun, 6 May 2018 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpHbTYLYOIWxX+qLDRMntEZPeoo3ilneFrwCJ5QPLNL37CqzEkwPqlTzN+EYTBn2vJvgRBM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:76c1:: with SMTP id j1-v6mr35838231plt.284.1525654239432; Sun, 06 May 2018 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525654239; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bj5jD018/LJydUKJwTd1mPc+JloXAlpREhvFZ61G3GDXmt9KdKSkCvIMC6QcrpVRDs I3/a+RblrFweEcpWPdX+N6JLmyJCwBnpQLHQ5qQEWkI31NvjgbKqjfeai/pvP1H0Hg8k CEHdfFRlkMvKhfRylwYTRwG3m5zJXoSo16zWQYEGQJcDSqaLXb3B5Okoo++nDFpLkf12 LSrcatXG9iMNSKwdccGxPq/Aye1iYYGQmAFe0Xl47MjGHSbOVVQ8bQk2oAHpfNbKuIfG lrOQg1VTPar3yzmgAHmlfjSBapUa7PuDqZhquzoQ7H+e8C4M5fisy/ifCV50ucuMistP O5ag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=7p3jqoYT43f8e7bqNUJJ8wgmWiR8ZfPRRFItz8WlCeY=; b=WF7wWMUV2qI0G7ow8ydoEfEnGhnPS1pY1LI5cMJksIUhKQyQ+80EteEtPwgInmOX+B c2bz5bx8xvVNC2GB5k3ypnefdEiUT12XstoT+AmwD/HnbBKiMZ6bWP82I57mWIlvxzL7 iPAVU/Hdqu2cx8bJMfimocosnvjBbmPHHyGmWbWiQaR0T5EWSboNoaC0TLhSVJS8YuMz T/TVPgMOeZVsPm5itxRJ7ykUBiJH9CKuIWHc829qWx2TVTd1uJm0TE3uxstAiN2TWrPY LT13lXlzSFngPS6kL/kKwDqKFDThD8Uv6lmXFGOdvjGGA4Pzn3iWIYs8fQlFNgsscYvM V7TQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b97yRfks; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 90-v6si20846193plc.205.2018.05.06.17.49.56; Sun, 06 May 2018 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b97yRfks; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751894AbeEGAqV (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 6 May 2018 20:46:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:33704 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751849AbeEGAqS (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2018 20:46:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id x12-v6so13364968wmc.0 for ; Sun, 06 May 2018 17:46:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7p3jqoYT43f8e7bqNUJJ8wgmWiR8ZfPRRFItz8WlCeY=; b=b97yRfks8D4VJENU6MstM3E0ckXWoyZe3nYQCbEUJw8HfY1NZ+ib52Y1Sukr1hkRCa r0kNGpGnPKvaxGZEPP6sd1tkWh955zdnJKiJ2AItuQyQ2W99qXsVm16OAFxARqAYWSMK yL3HvawvkKYvte/Ies2EwWET0Z0C0CqOgvQoJX1rdUBZAWjPODHyb6B7dhhs2xhLUoAc kU/7uh9nO4d1jkzBcbWDNft/DWtWpM8cwclEEZK1WeGNVGSPE3pe1H44gWDyT2lOHM4n B+Mcw7ZwMjO/lAk3cUg9toarr89dgKfKrykh0FQkiXs4ySHzgjlzPtM1rGDGyOII7ViG MmdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7p3jqoYT43f8e7bqNUJJ8wgmWiR8ZfPRRFItz8WlCeY=; b=jE9cBueVCgqpeqQxac7jKoMhOIVKOqiMkOARMF8MkoDwzjRPddC7Y2SbfxK4Kc19rH QQ5ZzEtnJgvc8LHYu/fgcUfZwk3Z769j2EcGy6Apju+q9Po8jXxcCfOxp5fp3Xv2kMST Hu4zpkUkxDqvRemDptGg05f8X+2au9A+pjSHWHIY5xW+FHZxVLaHb4JEBu+C+ysPAzfG kArri6CqyvUloRM54cmPTI4zpknE8Acg60JMH/0k3eNhjnxuKDSZlo7+weuV7S5zPFwb sZ/kSQYLYTLbyAL/OTNEHQc5ooeKt+2GumiumiltYXF6NuTaqjmik7D2ZM1r3QUxnSM0 +qkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAkfBHkPZMCvHAFmLCylOm5zLjxEakBPsv5MuCaVnzp9bpt2ogW b+6J7tn8GEqXr03RzxSZ3wNOSY9FWa5MWG2Q2U0= X-Received: by 2002:a50:f05c:: with SMTP id u28-v6mr47469660edl.91.1525653977259; Sun, 06 May 2018 17:46:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1525634395-23380-1-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> <1525634395-23380-9-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1525634395-23380-9-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> From: Joel Fernandes Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 00:46:06 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] perf/breakpoint: Split breakpoint "check" and "commit" To: frederic@kernel.org Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Catalin Marinas , chris@zankel.net, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , mpe@ellerman.id.au, dalias@libc.org, Ingo Molnar , mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 12:22 PM Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() mixes up attribute check and commit into > a single code entity. Therefore the validation may return an error due to > incorrect atributes while still leaving halfway modified architecture > breakpoint struct. > Now that we have split its logic on all archs, we can remove this > misdesigned function and call directly the arch check and commit > functions instead. This allows us to later avoid commiting > a breakpoint to architecture when its slot couldn't be allocated. [...] > diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > index 6e28d28..6896ceeb 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c > @@ -402,11 +402,12 @@ int dbg_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp) > static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) > { > - int ret; > + int err; > - ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > + err = hw_breakpoint_arch_check(bp, &bp->attr); > + if (err) > + return err; > + hw_breakpoint_arch_commit(bp); minor nit: To preserve bisectability, shouldn't this be the following in this and earlier patches? err = hw_breakpoint_arch_check(bp, &bp->attr); hw_breakpoint_arch_commit(bp); if (err) return err; And then in patch 9/9 you can fix it the right way? thanks, - Joel