Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262861AbTHZTho (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:37:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262854AbTHZThn (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:37:43 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:63198 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262789AbTHZThh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:37:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:33:09 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Marc-Christian Petersen , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.23-pre1] /proc/ikconfig support Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1214 Lines: 36 On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:36:59 +0200 Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: | On Monday 25 August 2003 19:50, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: | | Hi Marcelo, | | > Idea/Patch from Randy Dunlap including fixes/updates: | > From: Daniele Bellucci | > put_user() to return -EFAULT on error. | > From: Randy.Dunlap" | > Updated 'extract-ikconfig' script | > From me: | > /proc/ikconfig should only be allowed if CONFIG_PROC_FS=y | > Attached is /proc/ikconfig support. ... | | something not ok with this or do you just need some time to review it? :) > I have the same question about the seq_file "single" additions > patch that I sent yesterday.... ??? The seq_file patch needs EXPORT_SYMBOL right? And about ikconfig, hum, I'm not sure if I want that. Its nice, yes, but I still wonder. You are free to convince me though: I think people usually know what they compile in their kernels, dont they? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/