Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp2808859imm; Mon, 7 May 2018 01:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpDk6fCQejpqPE53nCpzBAjYYJ2VeYJml810QRLC8iu5QxxD/JCn0PQ3LBq4d4q/fhtMJD6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7d87:: with SMTP id a7-v6mr5906655plm.264.1525681078658; Mon, 07 May 2018 01:17:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525681078; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G/F58KCgEIAL2S8oqiI0RSE9gVKypaAkmjUMsUg3WNkhtvU8MKMpHlP+IWekm0bOdy 1NDEeD1OrfOEPiMMH7V4BOWTTrqKFEDq7J9vNbI5AKMv27iNiGHC9q1jaY0ddQGva47C BSADdoBhx2dGrtGy+ZU8Ny18Lnr0qsY+MuKQTCippNeZtoEkuTt0qVANDzXn0bCcUSLl UOThx4SnXc2Xt5A5vULc9Mxiaovl5KHsj2ULIfKFY6K3mIgmi6SfcQmwttxwZZjOatal qZwQqxLnh2xnnlbsio65RAwl0U6KFtvOLLBPyC+28hsrNwusKr4MfYHSWbNJoOhF5Nmm 1S7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=tEK0qOQz8pumdP/MQwmKQR3mcS6XMZvr2d4p50SNyns=; b=ATZua1HUYYzOkKK0U6GMZSWWUwIbkpUMczoVR2XvvFuOrQSugj2np7gPmlt8Orvor2 zM7GOROOlx+moe8q7HycJVRn9JohzLPcZdUWH7piM22Zgchx4uweeuVOqAc22O0ZtNhu PnN8++WErkq3lXN1VsUBuznH/FxL4R+FBwTv+chB3XZW3eXDIAIHZUFNBfwgb82zdZE+ xnrkZhCwANX44fz/J1ZR+00HtYkLcl9MU5jeCBSlKnBo4dTQ5c1LcXLdDVSOIR6/0U0P x/99KQoYBA6enOHOk1iuCPVvcKd3/2sNWSTGB+IW4sJMItUndLjsOK+NvQFiKUWRiz1A mhXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v1-v6si6704550pgr.30.2018.05.07.01.17.44; Mon, 07 May 2018 01:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752030AbeEGIRC (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 May 2018 04:17:02 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:45661 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751378AbeEGIQ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 04:16:59 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 021CA20705; Mon, 7 May 2018 10:16:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9604B20376; Mon, 7 May 2018 10:16:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 10:16:46 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Abhishek Sahu Cc: Archit Taneja , Richard Weinberger , Masahiro Yamada , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Miquel Raynal , Andy Gross , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] mtd: rawnand: helper function for setting up ECC parameters Message-ID: <20180507101646.3df649b0@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1525350041-22995-2-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> References: <1525350041-22995-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> <1525350041-22995-2-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:50:28 +0530 Abhishek Sahu wrote: > commit 2c8f8afa7f92 ("mtd: nand: add generic helpers to check, > match, maximize ECC settings") provides generic helpers which > drivers can use for setting up ECC parameters. > > Since same board can have different ECC strength nand chips so > following is the logic for setting up ECC strength and ECC step > size, which can be used by most of the drivers. > > 1. If both ECC step size and ECC strength are already set > (usually by DT) then just check whether this setting > is supported by NAND controller. > 2. If NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE is set, then select maximum ECC strength > supported by NAND controller. > 3. Otherwise, try to match the ECC step size and ECC strength closest > to the chip's requirement. If available OOB size can't fit the chip > requirement then select maximum ECC strength which can be fit with > available OOB size with warning. > > This patch introduces nand_ecc_param_setup function which calls the > required helper functions for the above logic. The drivers can use > this single function instead of calling the 3 helper functions > individually. > > CC: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu > --- > * Changes from v1: > > NEW PATCH > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > index 72f3a89..dd7a984 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > @@ -6249,6 +6249,48 @@ int nand_maximize_ecc(struct nand_chip *chip, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_maximize_ecc); > > +/** > + * nand_ecc_param_setup - Set the ECC strength and ECC step size > + * @chip: nand chip info structure > + * @caps: ECC engine caps info structure > + * @oobavail: OOB size that the ECC engine can use > + * > + * Choose the ECC strength according to following logic > + * > + * 1. If both ECC step size and ECC strength are already set (usually by DT) > + * then check if it is supported by this controller. > + * 2. If NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE is set, then select maximum ECC strength. > + * 3. Otherwise, try to match the ECC step size and ECC strength closest > + * to the chip's requirement. If available OOB size can't fit the chip > + * requirement then fallback to the maximum ECC step size and ECC strength > + * and print the warning. > + * > + * On success, the chosen ECC settings are set. > + */ > +int nand_ecc_param_setup(struct nand_chip *chip, > + const struct nand_ecc_caps *caps, int oobavail) Can we rename this function "nand_ecc_choose_conf()".