Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 7 May 2018 17:30:19 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc:     Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] rhashtable: further improve stability of
 rhashtable_walk
Message-ID: <20180507093019.qkz75qm7rocnbfnl@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <152540595840.18473.11298241115621799037.stgit@noble>
 <152540605438.18473.4797800779538116583.stgit@noble>
 <20180505094212.hpqjyv5ijibviuwh@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <87vac1db5t.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87vac1db5t.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 07:50:54AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Do we?  How could we fix it for both rhashtable and rhltable?

Well I suggested earlier to insert the walker object into the
hash table, which would be applicable regardless of whether it
is a normal rhashtable of a rhltable.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt