Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 07 May 2018 12:57:44 +0200
From:   damian <linux_dti@icloud.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel build with gcc 8 a lot of warnings
Message-id: <20180507105744.GA8586@zrhn9910b>
Mail-followup-to: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, peterz@infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180505192112.GA18728@zrhn9910b>
 <20180507045453.leou4zypnlcck4vr@treble>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20180507045453.leou4zypnlcck4vr@treble>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 06. May 23:54, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 09:21:12PM +0200, damian wrote:
> > Helllo together,
> > 
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > is something special to note when kernel build with gcc 8? I receive various warnings from the objtool:
> > With GCC 7 works all fine.
> > 
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: parse_cgroup_root_flags()+0x40: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_addrm_files()+0x2a3: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_apply_control_enable()+0x20b: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: rebind_subsystems()+0x296: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_sk_alloc_disable()+0x10: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: parse_cgroup_root_flags.cold.45()+0xa: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_addrm_files.cold.46()+0x17: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_apply_control_enable.cold.47()+0x24: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: rebind_subsystems.cold.48()+0x10: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/cgroup/cgroup.o: warning: objtool: cgroup_sk_alloc_disable.cold.49()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup
> >   CC      kernel/cgroup/stat.o
> >   CC [M]  arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.o
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.o: warning: objtool: acpi_register_lapic()+0x10: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.o: warning: objtool: acpi_map_cpu()+0x2c: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.o: warning: objtool: acpi_register_lapic.cold.6()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.o: warning: objtool: acpi_map_cpu.cold.7()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup
> 
> Thanks, this is a known issue with GCC 8 that I haven't gotten a chance
> to fix yet.  They're related to the fact that GCC 8 is splitting out
> 'unlikely' code into 'cold' subfunctions in .text.unlikely.
> 
> I've got some old patches that fix it.  Now that GCC 8 is out, I'll need
> get the patches dusted off and cleaned up for merging.
> 
> -- 
> Josh

Hello Josh,

if you need any additional information, please feel free and contact me. 

Best regards
Damian