Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262969AbTHZWaQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:30:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262971AbTHZWaQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:30:16 -0400 Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:8596 "EHLO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262969AbTHZW3p (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:29:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:29:41 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.22 released Message-ID: <20030826222941.GB27422@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200308251148.h7PBmU8B027700@hera.kernel.org> <20030825132358.GC14108@merlin.emma.line.org> <1061818535.1175.27.camel@debian> <20030825211307.GA3346@werewolf.able.es> <20030825222215.GX7038@fs.tum.de> <1061857293.15168.3.camel@debian> <20030826234901.1726adec.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030826234901.1726adec.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1611 Lines: 41 On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote: > El Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:21:34 +0200 Ram?n Rey Vicente____ escribi?: > > > I think merging ALSA in 2.4 series bring some of the advantages of the > > 2.6 series to the stable kernel, just new drivers with improvements over > > OSS... but I dont think that will help in the switching to 2.6. > > > I agree with Ramon; OSS doesn't provide drivers for some cards (or they > have really low quality, like the one for my card...). It's not just easing > the migration. > > Reasons to include ALSA in 2.4.23: > > - Lots of people need it. > - 99.9 % of kernels from vendors have it (they need to include them to > give good hardware support), which means they have been tested a lot. > - Lots of non-vendor kernels have it (even more testing). > - Some drivers have better quality. > - Low impact: they don't break anything; they're just configurable drivers. > - They're stable. > - They're cool. > > Reasons against: > Hum "stable"? Well, sorta. I have some machines that only work with OSS (CMI8330 only works with OSS Windows Sound System driver, not in sound blaster emu and not with Alsa in spite of the driver). The killer argument is it's easy to install separately. ./configure --with-cards=YOURS && make && make install - et voil?. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/