Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp3327392imm; Mon, 7 May 2018 10:18:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp/vuM0NdDrqwoM7eTJnU4lTXlI1HGR0wSL18T4c94mbP90xvbWJVOaFqfjd8Ypl4JbItIP X-Received: by 2002:a6b:980a:: with SMTP id a10-v6mr42726027ioe.212.1525713525755; Mon, 07 May 2018 10:18:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525713525; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w4aNg6zVjGQVRSAriHJ5CYaFvqVRiO8m8IpoyZLrAWMKumvoE0zJI2uMY1WtEwodyz FPgCgDN63adwqYGXVMnnZi2U6wOK9ESlhBHEEVNyt0EfezItB2KJ8FKF3haJ3ZGtz7Cv jw3oY5lYAwsNYQYwZ/Mtk5mtLYhqhIUJ/b2v2mtz+oSBcHfEYKnnTEg4dEhVnSzrLudQ +8AF06R0hJ89R1W+J/rGu/+XBEYUipINWJDcQ/bpYP7k2D6LUuaJ4IqfUAP45z/aH0WV 6oW3D2arRsTUbgn2wUsmYBLlq2Atuw7A9KF7mrnlUay9WVedh1ae8xScwEPUGQpVdg7P ZkPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Ypu2reNV0szjaf9OaIS0yBdaSAryevjpO+8uku/ViRo=; b=Qb4bC6JJfgdS9I1mLMM+kJyTMUE32X1Xs4SlpMljl8/wTv1JZmuP8AmlVbiS3NOYV6 KQlp3yEvlHxcqIaEZa7iIlwwJlmt4tDgrmjMZAcC7SjqDpccKFiJve8CH3UAB8wLX9mR hcRFvRQrwEJc9Dj5xh47J+on1GvWwL/gDIw3vYX8SAO0VGmAajRwF644kfh/eQs9nEgI yixSQFYA4b/7u5vcSsw4AD/mhaAhQWScAcNziQL5eFR4RaEPgdvxNhJiNZ3yhH69Wj6y BBp/VwUHBm3MnY8iv2fQwNynmNuHa5SdQAXCD8JlhUsQBcl+3/8NBzicyLu85Jh622gp /WwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i1-v6si21408420ioa.255.2018.05.07.10.18.32; Mon, 07 May 2018 10:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752631AbeEGRRg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 May 2018 13:17:36 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:32864 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752595AbeEGRRf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 13:17:35 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w47HEYFE130153 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:17:33 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2htsmfbuqh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:17:33 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 7 May 2018 18:17:31 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.141) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 7 May 2018 18:17:28 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w47HHRha58261684; Mon, 7 May 2018 17:17:27 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2F84C050; Mon, 7 May 2018 18:09:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E494C040; Mon, 7 May 2018 18:09:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.167.245.55] (unknown [9.167.245.55]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 7 May 2018 18:09:28 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] powerpc: Add TIDR CPU feature for Power9 To: "Alastair D'Silva" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, mikey@neuling.org, vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, malat@debian.org, felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pombredanne@nexb.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com, fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net, "Alastair D'Silva" References: <20180417020950.21446-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20180418010810.30937-1-alastair@au1.ibm.com> <20180418010810.30937-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com> From: Frederic Barrat Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 19:17:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180418010810.30937-2-alastair@au1.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18050717-0040-0000-0000-000004560C64 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18050717-0041-0000-0000-000020FA486F Message-Id: <2f95cc6f-9843-e2b9-6fca-2f4153317a5f@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-07_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805070173 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 18/04/2018 à 03:08, Alastair D'Silva a écrit : > From: Alastair D'Silva > > This patch adds a CPU feature bit to show whether the CPU has > the TIDR register available, enabling as_notify/wait in userspace. > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h | 3 ++- > arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h > index 4e332f3531c5..54c4cbbe57b4 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h > @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static inline void cpu_feature_keys_init(void) { } > #define CPU_FTR_P9_TM_HV_ASSIST LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0000100000000000) > #define CPU_FTR_P9_TM_XER_SO_BUG LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0000200000000000) > #define CPU_FTR_P9_TLBIE_BUG LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0000400000000000) > +#define CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR LONG_ASM_CONST(0x0000800000000000) > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > @@ -462,7 +463,7 @@ static inline void cpu_feature_keys_init(void) { } > CPU_FTR_CFAR | CPU_FTR_HVMODE | CPU_FTR_VMX_COPY | \ > CPU_FTR_DBELL | CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR | CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S | \ > CPU_FTR_TM_COMP | CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 | CPU_FTR_PKEY | \ > - CPU_FTR_P9_TLBIE_BUG) > + CPU_FTR_P9_TLBIE_BUG | CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR) > #define CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD1 ((CPU_FTRS_POWER9 | CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD1) & \ > (~CPU_FTR_SAO)) > #define CPU_FTRS_POWER9_DD2_0 CPU_FTRS_POWER9 > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c > index 11a3a4fed3fb..10f8b7f55637 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c > @@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ static __init void cpufeatures_cpu_quirks(void) > if ((version & 0xffff0000) == 0x004e0000) { > cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features &= ~(CPU_FTR_DAWR); > cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_P9_TLBIE_BUG; > + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR; Isn't it redundant with adding the flag to CPU_FTRS_POWER9? Fred > } > } >