Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp3514203imm; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq9nIDhArGlB74WAf44syK3TDuyFUJY1Fu3YQwWJyCnCPqiApAs3alzVt92eySq/e6OVhSD X-Received: by 2002:aca:6545:: with SMTP id j5-v6mr25017979oiw.151.1525725757061; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525725756; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vXwvH8RmHELXpfs4iQu8fWXUsW+E3P5lrtMYenbWa8Qea0Q38cs/MfDGLHHIsZB6dq wFT4CbgnGehUWxbyVtvveHbW5/92tezTMwkUO33Q9JOLwJQhxNSQr3aJBZn0loR+mgPQ TGqw479dHpM5rZSV2GZ9T/KJ1UEuh95dYlo7TDLO0geXraCtUlj/keZGuBGRxD43KCDi qsDVOzML+nJHEVCd3/i1pDs3bTqZlLqAA8Hqd8akneJsmkNgMTp143MxzpFhx/PqGYZl ycDhpYN7XFSq5ZJ4WiHQWzU04t4eBaG/pVfOrJOnMad7psxsh3ZEj6LUgJ/lPZYS2dE8 Tlww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=z/h2N2TLfToC2/6DFSiG1TkiDL68voouaUzVWOZFRPE=; b=jYDiDkVX7JSdi9+2PPs09uFA2KwmDsRwBgbAKXd7zcRIikzBztrTGHp4Lr0EReeZ6L YVMjOdOHsXjABtOvw+nqTauqZdCnBMpl3A+exbTK5Ckv4vZ7O0NDocXGGvOhYWGpYOzI aezZS6QjO1dqvdTju0xmLQbpAQoybSIwQvpusy2cKKqrVjVs3ls3vvxngs98qp9TVRdM AHNlHw1iTFcNjvjm+GxM0yW9wGu5GmQHHa0YP0VU43ntAC7XB8bot8EOOmlrkQx5HIxA a7XTYFaD7kU2++8yO8NMfsiFRz9Mj6RTu+t2yhF8uaPXs8J2Om80E22q+Ku0xvT9+5Zw eYFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eifJQdSe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p185-v6si7480770oia.396.2018.05.07.13.42.22; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eifJQdSe; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753009AbeEGUmG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 May 2018 16:42:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-f66.google.com ([209.85.160.66]:43891 "EHLO mail-pl0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752796AbeEGUmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 16:42:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-f66.google.com with SMTP id a39-v6so752468pla.10 for ; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=z/h2N2TLfToC2/6DFSiG1TkiDL68voouaUzVWOZFRPE=; b=eifJQdSeaULAvXRgNiB1bERvwYMSeigbnB+CV/7TQfdou5+QJkHryHLPs8lyy0zsuZ 1ZDiSlgzca+13GZJoDwrda5TXdshtm/Dwl6Ku5Nlqf6dKf0ciRP7h0lWixDX+dhGYEKS dmeeu+ybUKXvy3mkcBC/2GBQKf+LLLbFSYk4zuAHBHkDMoIp+zQg/kcHEGsVdF2njCdd X02w42u7kUn7AN0ez6fAvYp96t83fDp9dspJBPSya1gVfBgx60T3p4430geo1gq/bQQb YYs27DghHfvyhUcXC6fWaEoIo+OhLmPkKimnBoIlE/bnehtYYq1Ngkt5/e9ubAPBgcZi eFHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=z/h2N2TLfToC2/6DFSiG1TkiDL68voouaUzVWOZFRPE=; b=djPJqVPW0tvrKgljnAGffZcv3FKebkJz1tnMvSyCpveCRLY/Y0DIYitfsJK+pmnKK0 8Gpm5IVLXHGUOxVSpkSsEEMn0Mhp5FPx4j4mA2VUenWxsAZG0tGLR1ulazkc2bp/KceS LGX1uuqs7TtasSiSwyjndXfcPuhx8tgAJ6SP8PgStSl800bT9x9I+lFRYHQ5/fdyLjEa LuvbTPQDOZbGdBGFzFuqKUhq9TGizHMp5ydfj1+G/S/8zbAXn7IiDBEikKwgGqIACnIz Qz9EHYOsZigsNEGre2P7v1e1xzDXuBspD/0c3f1eF3uOwtPUdZhsO+Rs1Bw6i3YNPl7x WoAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBbLli+1d/hb08ga8GX7irtEWR7HJoYQQTuu4aHrTR2m5HeZU70 MCU8af4eylWJYjdVjBHeH4c/7ydeo2M= X-Received: by 10.98.137.219 with SMTP id n88mr37188238pfk.11.1525725722118; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:1000:1600:3122:ea9c:d178:eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm66563994pfk.164.2018.05.07.13.42.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 May 2018 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Joel Fernandes To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zilstra , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tom Zanussi , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Glexiner , Boqun Feng , Paul McKenney , Frederic Weisbecker , Randy Dunlap , Masami Hiramatsu , Fenguang Wu , Baohong Liu , Vedang Patel , kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v6 4/5] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 13:41:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20180507204143.13061-5-joelaf@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog In-Reply-To: <20180507204143.13061-1-joelaf@google.com> References: <20180507204143.13061-1-joelaf@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" In recent tests with IRQ on/off tracepoints, a large performance overhead ~10% is noticed when running hackbench. This is root caused to calls to rcu_irq_enter_irqson and rcu_irq_exit_irqson from the tracepoint code. Following a long discussion on the list [1] about this, we concluded that srcu is a better alternative for use during rcu idle. Although it does involve extra barriers, its lighter than the sched-rcu version which has to do additional RCU calls to notify RCU idle about entry into RCU sections. In this patch, we change the underlying implementation of the trace_*_rcuidle API to use SRCU. This has shown to improve performance alot for the high frequency irq enable/disable tracepoints. Test: Tested idle and preempt/irq tracepoints. Here are some performance numbers: With a run of the following 30 times on a single core x86 Qemu instance with 1GB memory: hackbench -g 4 -f 2 -l 3000 Completion times in seconds. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. No patches (without this series) Mean: 3.048 Median: 3.025 Std Dev: 0.064 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with RCU implementation: Mean: 3.451 (-11.66 %) Median: 3.447 (-12.22%) Std Dev: 0.049 With Lockdep using irq tracepoints with SRCU implementation (this series): Mean: 3.020 (I would consider the improvement against the "without this series" case as just noise). Median: 3.013 Std Dev: 0.033 [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10344297/ Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zilstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Thomas Glexiner Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: Paul McKenney Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Fenguang Wu Cc: Baohong Liu Cc: Vedang Patel Cc: kernel-team@android.com Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) --- include/linux/tracepoint.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/tracepoint.c | 15 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index c94f466d57ef..f56f290cf8eb 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ struct trace_eval_map { #define TRACEPOINT_DEFAULT_PRIO 10 +extern struct srcu_struct tracepoint_srcu; + extern int tracepoint_probe_register(struct tracepoint *tp, void *probe, void *data); extern int @@ -77,6 +80,9 @@ int unregister_tracepoint_module_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) */ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu); +#endif synchronize_sched(); } @@ -129,18 +135,38 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); * as "(void *, void)". The DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS() will pass in just * "void *data", where as the DECLARE_TRACE() will pass in "void *data, proto". */ -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck) \ +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \ do { \ struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \ void *it_func; \ void *__data; \ + int __maybe_unused idx = 0; \ \ if (!(cond)) \ return; \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \ - rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ - it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + \ + /* \ + * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \ + * doesn't work from the idle path. \ + */ \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + if (in_nmi()) { \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); \ + return; /* no srcu from nmi */ \ + } \ + \ + idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + srcu_dereference_notrace((tp)->funcs, \ + &tracepoint_srcu); \ + /* To keep it consistent with !rcuidle path */ \ + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ + } else { \ + rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \ + it_func_ptr = \ + rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \ + } \ + \ if (it_func_ptr) { \ do { \ it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \ @@ -148,9 +174,13 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void); ((void(*)(proto))(it_func))(args); \ } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \ } \ - rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ - if (rcucheck) \ - rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \ + \ + if (rcuidle) { \ + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ + srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\ + } else { \ + rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ + } \ } while (0) #ifndef MODULE diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c index 671b13457387..2089f579f790 100644 --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ extern struct tracepoint * const __start___tracepoints_ptrs[]; extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[]; +DEFINE_SRCU(tracepoint_srcu); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_srcu); + /* Set to 1 to enable tracepoint debug output */ static const int tracepoint_debug; @@ -67,16 +70,26 @@ static inline void *allocate_probes(int count) return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes; } -static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) { kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu)); } +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes); +} + static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old) { if (old) { struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old, struct tp_probes, probes[0]); + /* + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU, + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we + * cover both cases. So lets chain the SRCU and RCU callbacks. + */ call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes); } } -- 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog