Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:30:40 -0400
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] small sparc Makefile cleanups
Message-ID: <20030826213040.A16588@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
References: <20030826221922.GJ7038@fs.tum.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030826221922.GJ7038@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:19:23AM +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 900
Lines: 21

> Date: 	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:19:23 +0200
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

> -#
> -# Uncomment the first CFLAGS if you are doing kgdb source level
> -# debugging of the kernel to get the proper debugging information.
> -
> -IS_EGCS := $(shell if $(CC) -m32 -S -o /dev/null -xc /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo y; else echo n; fi; )
> -NEW_GAS := $(shell if $(LD) --version 2>&1 | grep 'elf64_sparc' > /dev/null; then echo y; else echo n; fi)

This is sane, and was on todo list of months. Just shows
what kind of backlog I accumulated. Can someone else test it
for me? Please reply with result and outut from
 gcc -v && as -v < /dev/null.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/