Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1525755090.24338.1.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: bug in tag handling in blk-mq?
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Date:   Tue, 08 May 2018 06:51:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <84145CD7-B917-4B32-8A5C-310C1910DB71@linaro.org>
References: <999DF2B3-4EE8-4BDF-89C5-EB0C2D8BF69E@linaro.org>
         <7760d23b-7a4c-a645-1c7a-da7569bb44dc@kernel.dk>
         <84145CD7-B917-4B32-8A5C-310C1910DB71@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 20:02 +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> 
> > Is there a reproducer?

Just building fat config kernels works for me.  It was highly non-
deterministic, but reproduced quickly twice in a row with Paolos hack.
??
> Ok Mike, I guess it's your turn now, for at least a stack trace.

Sure.  I'm deadlined ATM, but will get to it.

	-Mike