Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp3964982imm; Tue, 8 May 2018 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqV92Ow79arLhiooND4R60GlbQtAWEbKIu0oK722zxrGiZ07syGGSfjRyvfU667wDACVlla X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:70c9:: with SMTP id l9-v6mr37909593plt.382.1525763089544; Tue, 08 May 2018 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525763089; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hdu0dmj3mxHeqECDPvhYxCZ8CraK0rzNUST3I9ok6K7M1viVInZAkiglZNgNtKTSKP nIImrvNNpZrAO+/r/wLuJTRmdUfidBJ1GVnDDfcBYcM1wOcnbNyo9FYueS2iNmrm1Wv0 diCUF8Q8e88/wNDa73d/XH9YtJc7tF+aj6aGHQe10vraaoxrkZo6DYOohB2A2W7A8BCJ immFk7rcOJa2x13j+Nfef7EXS7CN015p5XnxKbj8OjM0IX13zD7ATJjRhe1bUoZlIw+u qkWdNn7L6/YxTprjIYrC1qNHf/+UKt1nYAqpR3QfZJwUJ6jP0YuylFv5Krui5yjQu5mc bhXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=dVvCyvcMa0EQR4dBpZkyS8MsjSix0GrAgqJYzzy3J9o=; b=NSrv84BRXOxniX5lolypYGTqXvpNjfgIFIHevRSElK/t1XQWM+gajDvr9jNld3nsBn /BSev4MNYmdoY7Z1p7HL0n7rC+2eIMzuyeLlTDqO11UYtYfG2yD449upIxudqPrMhLUd 6Y3b0tYLd80WUllGIEZW6Cciv/6JTd3OjkjhV8BJxismKe1JYCYM8LqmcO549DBGgxuC 9tW3QKfvKpu11ad/LeGsUKJlE0rfajLsT7uTp5HsrFSfUQ8EuLMhctu9hmfEw8yjvX5r RANnGiQ02QQB0nOLAjdt1Mw193oq9ek8YOX307mQrMBvbhb3+BU8IQmBxf6s5aOUgdbf fgIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f28-v6si24856659plj.255.2018.05.08.00.04.35; Tue, 08 May 2018 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754531AbeEHHCb (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 May 2018 03:02:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:50976 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754154AbeEHHC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2018 03:02:29 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w486wndc014935 for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 03:02:28 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hu6kwsf4c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 08 May 2018 03:02:28 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 8 May 2018 08:02:23 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 8 May 2018 08:02:20 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4872Jk966388174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 May 2018 07:02:19 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B61D4C046; Tue, 8 May 2018 07:54:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F8E4C044; Tue, 8 May 2018 07:54:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.8.166]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 8 May 2018 07:54:19 +0100 (BST) Received: by rapoport-lnx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 08 May 2018 10:02:17 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-doc , linux-mm , lkml , Mike Rapoport Subject: [PATCH 2/3] docs/vm: numa_memory_policy: s/Linux memory policy/NUMA memory policy/ Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 10:02:09 +0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1525762930-28163-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1525762930-28163-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18050807-0020-0000-0000-0000041A3C7D X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18050807-0021-0000-0000-000042AF741E Message-Id: <1525762930-28163-3-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-08_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805080069 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The document describes NUMA memory policy and as it is a part of the Linux documentation it's obvious that this is Linux memory policy. Besides, "Linux memory policy" may refer to other policies, e.g. memory hotplug policy, and using term NUMA makes the documentation less ambiguous. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport --- Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.rst | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.rst b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.rst index ac0b396..d78c5b3 100644 --- a/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.rst +++ b/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.rst @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ .. _numa_memory_policy: -=================== -Linux Memory Policy -=================== +================== +NUMA Memory Policy +================== -What is Linux Memory Policy? +What is NUMA Memory Policy? ============================ In the Linux kernel, "memory policy" determines from which node the kernel will @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Shared Policy Components of Memory Policies ----------------------------- -A Linux memory policy consists of a "mode", optional mode flags, and +A NUMA memory policy consists of a "mode", optional mode flags, and an optional set of nodes. The mode determines the behavior of the policy, the optional mode flags determine the behavior of the mode, and the optional set of nodes can be viewed as the arguments to the @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Internally, memory policies are implemented by a reference counted structure, struct mempolicy. Details of this structure will be discussed in context, below, as required to explain the behavior. -Linux memory policy supports the following 4 behavioral modes: +NUMA memory policy supports the following 4 behavioral modes: Default Mode--MPOL_DEFAULT This mode is only used in the memory policy APIs. Internally, @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ MPOL_INTERLEAVED address range or file. During system boot up, the temporary interleaved system default policy works in this mode. -Linux memory policy supports the following optional mode flags: +NUMA memory policy supports the following optional mode flags: MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES This flag specifies that the nodemask passed by -- 2.7.4