Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp4964091imm; Tue, 8 May 2018 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrLmNWgWDUhUCIoYuJHflY0xE+2sVAvXM3+I8uPUFJoXh7ra7arnBbUds9Nq//9iHkiW/Mc X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:24a5:: with SMTP id w34-v6mr44082947pla.328.1525830112126; Tue, 08 May 2018 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525830112; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vqb7qthL/zApFofmAbXsUYW23Cr5To+UGbXHrztX/2xdvrn3o5zmM12h7TTa0tgRvl fw1MXKaUCPHJvREjwZY9JVUrmrVPutt6yfCm+XM2kQp5WpMcGQnQj6y4CQB8e9M6ya5q 6RP9GfpJSy1yQ5QdxSPG8KpwG6ak72GzbbHs4Ih6nL2PlZgMLbarI9AgIJsfT/Spa6rj sSCNgnx4DSYboqVdTw0+Ta8L6zYHt880/zanUKdycc8X4xhfnjJMgtZT855krShCz5qh g1GQkyJ7RbgV+4+VrG7X//lMxmPlbqOM96ubqEpOfMOIinnLaMwylIghV0DRLD2lcUXP UxMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=gPAnpIW2v+CCH1trT1Dwpm5dz4ApgtcGe3b7k2aih2g=; b=wQDKRsbhkMowdNWfKlEm2YA9lgE5Lieucc4njwlcSIFeK46NDSadEa7ttOZHlvjAmg qa/7lLUns6PcN5kjgwBkFZt3oHAc/+8mINSnb0U2gQcfphUjZE3kZJ1S6va7mDH6jr3a e5EUqxII0BBcWmruawghSPHX3rPEE0nkGdz8ne/leJIwZJDyCOaavJnqWVbMT9Um642z wtz4++2Zt2HMyzGbb1XoU3xCOhe/55rDLUIVwD+5Bh37k7VTdDrp0ED6tqpUrtZvIBvI 8FPt3HJo+S77HTIsRq1D8TUulwuOVratw4K/aeVsJh7c82b7FNw8cqmsAsDRKBImXIR3 yABQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17-v6si6361949plq.115.2018.05.08.18.41.37; Tue, 08 May 2018 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933492AbeEIBlO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 May 2018 21:41:14 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:56071 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933305AbeEIBlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2018 21:41:13 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40gfFy0lXDz9s1w; Wed, 9 May 2018 11:41:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au From: Michael Ellerman To: Josh Poimboeuf , Torsten Duwe Cc: Jiri Kosina , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ppc64le livepatch: implement reliable stacktrace for newer consistency models In-Reply-To: <20180509001432.5nd55ictwf5yi7sm@treble> References: <20180305164928.GA17953@lst.de> <20180308162616.yhbymodggnfzpskx@treble> <20180309174718.2700b29e@blackhole.lan> <20180312153536.7avozx64ku4lvd3e@treble> <20180504123834.GA16581@lst.de> <20180507154208.jo4s43olrf5a3hw4@treble> <20180508103832.085378b9@blackhole.lan> <20180509001432.5nd55ictwf5yi7sm@treble> Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 11:41:09 +1000 Message-ID: <87sh71zjuy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh Poimboeuf writes: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote: >> On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:42:08 -0500 >> Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> >> > The subject doesn't actively describe what the patch does, maybe >> > change it to something like: >> > >> > powerpc: Add support for HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE >> > >> > or maybe >> > >> > powerpc: Add support for livepatch consistency model >> >> Maybe $SUBJECT? You're absolutely right, the old subject was just a >> leftover of my original attempt to just set the flag, before Miroslav >> corrected me. I just kept on copying it without a second thought. Thanks >> for noting. > > Generally we refer to it as "the consistency model". So I would > propose a minor edit: > > ppc64le/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model We use "powerpc" as the prefix. So I've used: powerpc/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model cheers