Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 17:44:40 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "w@1wt.eu" <w@1wt.eu>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
Message-ID: <20180509084440.GW13402@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20180501205448.GE10479@thunk.org>
 <20180501211551.GI2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAKMK7uHjA27K8y-kwYFyhLy3cSkJJw8Oe1gP=3hZXdfxcWAcNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm>
 <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org>
 <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net>
 <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <20180503230905.GA98604@atomide.com>
 <CAPDyKFrCKkRHwOh-7yfFbvMp+Ykhs7oXrDwhTShSPvUBvpn2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aBaYPhOdNx+t7mr3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrCKkRHwOh-7yfFbvMp+Ykhs7oXrDwhTShSPvUBvpn2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--aBaYPhOdNx+t7mr3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:21:26PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> Then, why don't we have a pre-integration tree for fixes? That would
> at least simply automated testing of fixes separately from new
> material.

> Perhaps this has already been discussed, and concluded and it's not
> worth it, then apologize for my ignorance.

I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
home.

--aBaYPhOdNx+t7mr3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlrytPgACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9D63Qf/QlBiwp/EESFcBm2MHh4DWXDANQOzoL9MGxKH/xzaoErJI2VPSNc3XnD8
Kfay1kMcY+TZDfKIemq5vWRxaAodrL2EJFs+z9yEd/yVHWLzb6ptuAi5GeztiuSL
z6+wE+8IgfurggT/lg8f6azlOV9Jq0f///LsAdaycDUfS924Oug/V2VznGRWbcTB
lQeaADEyMmB65UWVr7F7Mu55bSev7t1+usM0kL0Jqa6OgKWl0EwNW/ylKUHPp3cG
io3Cn2vcuPIfVatpuPoYPXmRhGWEIoHi+a199jFQIYdmAwPpe5Cdyh25ZR3yWcWJ
7Qg3L/zUUvBFgiSorfRHtsg+avDhIQ==
=bfsk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aBaYPhOdNx+t7mr3--