Received: by 10.192.165.148 with SMTP id m20csp5402393imm; Wed, 9 May 2018 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoB01JKxlE9DPVw9Npy5uuQQLYZ0YEb/VaaPys1y5Bmh9LQhbBmMFhihnQEi2RVOYAQ4ZBC X-Received: by 10.98.161.17 with SMTP id b17mr43324830pff.132.1525865801613; Wed, 09 May 2018 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1525865801; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IZMr8i8OUqZOFITmNGFRRSFZ0s643+V+wLlAm8j95t3khLJ11wgp0vw8Cnno8OH7n8 4koqCTdPLkyQs+MQiXjSsmvH4EKjxjf3zqU3sixUI/eSjme66gYqMsAbEoEQcyXkEVvF 2svzpWOIolBe0W9C7ppcXDNrIuijg6Lh4sV1z7I7w/dJgcF7FpEYdnIrTjgM/dZA1CSc Nhn2Do+KpoJcCGL7njBBRwZCkuB/xvY5nmuN6n2Vr80/l5hBddIXczRhKsBfUaP5kS+B JHUbRD4wFaF+0YD/RSh9UK/KnpmbuMurzP/e2/WD9WlqTIZs5qtzC9REnW5j8+1J+aCl QVHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=ulLZSAxHnvooZk1oZB0zHsY+o3fnuFjqoDXisNd+iXo=; b=xpxk9NVz/KLVtsme70oZBERxECCtdM1XfoHHqDJCEwc2zAR2lV2jSMxyaxIN5o5lLh RZkV9/dECok64Q1IW09hQxSimS6rsW1EUM/Vi95mVjFPxvlLIUbcI1YjbhoE/jgodddJ f5ROJz4FW4UfE4h+uEuoBN4FGtU9MIhA9wC+c17GKj1zvhCHAdJsMGEEDwl0yknUsn4A Ojih/vGdoFrURCQRhL8UrMItRFyz4OqS5zG9Ly6BL2U3dokGzs3gLafW2eNi/SmHSv4Q rypB+q1odfUaR34renx/qDuXdOQa8/N7CUw86rU21EDKYXyYpGILPeV2xDnwTuJe2taC ESOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x12-v6si21511739pgv.389.2018.05.09.04.36.26; Wed, 09 May 2018 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934263AbeEILeq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 May 2018 07:34:46 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54171 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933883AbeEILep (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2018 07:34:45 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2018 04:34:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,381,1520924400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="227040771" Received: from pipin.fi.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.68.37]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2018 04:34:41 -0700 From: Felipe Balbi To: Chunfeng Yun , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Matthias Brugger , Chunfeng Yun , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: composite: fill bcdUSB as 0x0320 for SuperSpeed or higher speeds In-Reply-To: <69cc710fa8b7d18c494c9f482fd2b8e6fb7c0c94.1525865206.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> References: <69cc710fa8b7d18c494c9f482fd2b8e6fb7c0c94.1525865206.git.chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:33:13 +0300 Message-ID: <8736z1kqrq.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Chunfeng Yun writes: > The USB3CV version 2.1.80 (March 26, 2018) requires all devices > ( gen1, gen2, single lane, dual lane) to return the value of 0x0320 > in the bcdUSB field this sounds really odd. What happens when I get a USB 3.1 compliant device off-the-shelf and run it through USB3CV? will it fail now? Care to share a screenshot or the raw html of the test result? =2D-=20 balbi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEElLzh7wn96CXwjh2IzL64meEamQYFAlry3HkACgkQzL64meEa mQZVhw//c8t4VTHKlwox/tPXPbndtR4FkwXphjHcAuuOELFYCjxYaP9aG+7WTqYr 7GdOsC+FkGagg0qJ6XQ1thV1pAZ9y/onGmCYnCpEyOXHFO0UVBz60/ooRt2eeLqc Akk/Obl92v5vGG2Nh5u3cNOIgMovp6g56K4it2Gu3kTuuORQIqcx6bwNqwahKf4R 7X3gZ+pSVWvq0s0TpYeAYrDIzHKoIuXnCJJlVBaqDpf8gNUbzAg1nw9kKuNkVupy cGSHfgTDIhnd3/cHwNluHbyGRAwPDMUs1ERqUAyoUVweFoKM1Y8zd0NzXIkhPzgP J3cXHCIKrtdy4RsbwpVkTZRlFN7UjNaTRCUDQHENfmwzIHR3pn9tOnkLTp6cjClI Pwj+Ni6G+CWGA6+KCwpI/8aUakyTd2fsue+X64bSslI+mjc24nTtii3rLD+oNevF MLETaiAlU6Xn4YhCAfv/A/LzxxTUHqQnEJlBlqAnZO+9hVBQ+jL1DuM2BqgrNUoL mb1m9yLHYasbQ6iJPjDegqO4M+A/nLNS6SY/2e4wc0uwI7CXP5P3eQGp6H57GxF2 XtGUYQhSTjyj6qs89uicNRsy70v52E3BzFBWw2lmVikqrU9HiD3VC7cJCK5/n3ZN IaxwIsiIpRKpWxoSvl/Vd6B3+FDIeiu6tfJTHcGirDdRFlS1E6M= =yC5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--