Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp586705imm; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:19:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqSu5uuR/3OqOkrdRhAP68HPX4igAo6LkM4Lz7zNw2hdGIE6eNMbPNAQMZl1XLkHyFOyySD X-Received: by 2002:a63:7b1d:: with SMTP id w29-v6mr3999693pgc.417.1526033942214; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:19:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526033942; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eIybEAvIYev6dMEdZmbwl/u59ossSpcOB7p+4BmqxNrjcfIRMMXlh31qYacxFwRBYp J6T6Xt5kXy5Hi37h9h2WaEglZUkTUFy1YwIqrS/xvudTrQ26nm1UvXuw0nPyY78H9AHr PPYteffZrvOT5y2Br7kG4te0B1ssyI3JlEjFvEBMB+BWiF+38BthdtdSP3alQVlc36a1 WrzugcjbDSMtLmEDi70jsK0Gnu4K0vq6K2aj9YQxxgxSkZ7d/tnndON1MMWNH+R0+cvJ igmMrSTiwjOZ+Rlkkcc5n35P8X1ONvj3XC6Rne80psO69xHc5sj41HWt4xNK3puRnnjQ dC7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to :from:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=mTuHRuP/t3j08j6IpWED+LV1utUQDKh3zh93fQ2uBF4=; b=UcW+WzAj7avxs4PmXm6ByroTkccfC5KooF3kEi0720hDHAvsZ2LA1Vp3/PjY3BTp/A Zv28mlOKqQmWx+J2pZ7C7zuxsCQ9jb6awl82i6OJbijyg2c+uUpBw7G2JQQOcWUVwtsM oBal7qPHHOD2C7mG8j5bwvmiE6u7ucWLshzgCOPpnHhPoW9o05ZtfFG739sxj31eMVJi ppwSlUNRj8quczqxTzqZKCzxisrv/OdTJ9Vd5n/nCIF4rOgJxsLhGFNLFwDC/l2f3fb6 GD1M2ebd8N52Ir7TdY6pLFXX2DayPJ1MYbn9hG22H8F7onxC2ARVoA4khQ1P8455Gffk OfHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=KsTBjEmN; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=FpBICFYp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16-v6si2836147plo.5.2018.05.11.03.18.47; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=KsTBjEmN; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=FpBICFYp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752744AbeEKKSg (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 May 2018 06:18:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:39468 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750852AbeEKKSf (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 06:18:35 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4CF460A00; Fri, 11 May 2018 10:18:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1526033914; bh=mTuHRuP/t3j08j6IpWED+LV1utUQDKh3zh93fQ2uBF4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KsTBjEmNo/X5aqcxk0jMxqBuPxSnNioUHIRZnuNUa60+1S0yKxlJ0yyq6M89mdd97 mi/ZudfFz5PfXUrhgnV8CyLDw/eMkbugQKaoKB3/ly3j5wn06idrJiXohI7r7TJnK4 2IczJxAdVOvRdU3pVidzmz0ap7xCfJaNOHmTYrGM= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from x230.qca.qualcomm.com (88-114-240-52.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C3B560290; Fri, 11 May 2018 10:18:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1526033913; bh=mTuHRuP/t3j08j6IpWED+LV1utUQDKh3zh93fQ2uBF4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FpBICFYpSzqsqXeStGY7lz399b1WjcOp3nQ7etPWQEz1kMs3lduWbcElJSktQVwT1 36ZvcWw9XqKO3AoGWbwU0ruT8EbVmZTPYBh6iKTgdE4SOcf9/9jg263RYOOW6/a4OT pjelt/7MF/J+LMGC8PlFQGNIc3TFps8q7MceL78U= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 1C3B560290 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Larry Finger Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= , Michael =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=BCsch?= , Matt Redfearn , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens , LKML , =?utf-8?Q?Rafa?= =?utf-8?Q?=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.17 2/2] ssb: make SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE depend on SSB = y References: <20180510111401.1161-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <20180510111401.1161-2-zajec5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:18:30 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Larry Finger's message of "Thu, 10 May 2018 11:07:09 -0500") Message-ID: <8736yycx6x.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Larry Finger writes: > On 05/10/2018 06:14 AM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: >> From: Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki >> >> SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE protects MIPS specific code that calls not exported >> symbols pcibios_enable_device and register_pci_controller. This code is >> supposed to be compiled only with ssb builtin. >> >> This fixes: >> ERROR: "pcibios_enable_device" [drivers/ssb/ssb.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: "register_pci_controller" [drivers/ssb/ssb.ko] undefined! >> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:92: __modpost] Error 1 >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki > > This patch needs a "Reported-by: Matt Redfearn ". > > Applying both patches leads to a correct configuration for PCI. I > cannot test on my present hardware, but the patches seem to be > correct. > > Reviewed-by: Larry Finger > > @Kalle: Please drop my patch from yesterday. This solution is much better. Dropped, thanks for letting me know. --=20 Kalle Valo