Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp589007imm; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpQpurWSzoLBqFGvF0SzinagW2TxNyJXS+xiUBqyGrLqAyrMtTtk6q6f6goSuQciq2lHHiF X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8d85:: with SMTP id v5-v6mr4924738plo.93.1526034094671; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:21:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526034094; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G+SWolGuaKmqVxn7g883hASQdQ4F3p5Ie6KfN8FMc741+JIuhmdHE/gUajIH2effFp LtKg4QCI+g3J9V2vnT13vmwzte3uxi2l7kUsJj03SC5JXHvfOLxcz7GplENe2u7DKtSN 5WXMAeebsBDoUR7nFTdEEKNXppaqsU8w/ZhV7juPpkme1+MSigI8fX3IIA2K3u4U2BJm IwQZSLt34b0mLvludk2CC+WEuC/ThAgA2OSKr4UwVktLSgi5BX1jfHebvX+Pm+eqQLRv gNe10NDDFXSI+HJ1qMe5lkeRh/5NMxdhzR5f6DvRi3yhLrLTl5/9DG2C/JU351rM9vhw HJlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=CGtrPKQwOyQA6oKD5Olz383esTAXKgRxRAgLkNPYgIs=; b=eEXHddWmNJbyUfDS6OqOeMNmPc80RplNWfhcuqxj60LG98bvLuTSL7746x0CsmvYsl wSmC6pnEs6DPDY9/AuyUSmU1trOBP5apO+L655hGNnvxPEimtY0biJs9qSZogBvZfTv2 XR+wkrtRUfusH0W8fIemlWwjbGjkfIGyc2arI+Myjdoh0LGzdbXXDdyDQ3XvVRjnWGLI NmuSsfW7a2eT1a34lTuFBRcHonN+dKnhsTHGXYikfDJL73inlkQJ9SjAmxqMGADyB04f 7dQIXt+dtdZt5w6CerypMHiOVHQPJ/+tMZV2BtHOoYCFCzA8Jz0KVWk9M9AyRRFUQO33 66/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l10-v6si2568136pfc.188.2018.05.11.03.21.20; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752859AbeEKKTo (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 May 2018 06:19:44 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:53165 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbeEKKTm (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 06:19:42 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2018 03:19:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,388,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="55026393" Received: from jsakkine-mobl1.tm.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.50.71]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2018 03:19:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:19:38 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Laurent Bigonville Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: verify locality released before returning from release_locality Message-ID: <20180511101938.GF20210@linux.intel.com> References: <20180505195453.10431-1-jsnitsel@redhat.com> <20180505200315.x7jt33j7psizmfyi@cantor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le 05/05/18 ? 22:03, Jerry Snitselaar a ?crit?: > > On Sat May 05 18, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > > Laurent, > > Hello Jerry, > > > Can you try this patch with your system since it is the one > > that has exhibited the problem so far. I've tested on a > > tpm2.0 and tpm1.2 system here. > > I just tested the patch and the driver is loading fine again and the device > in /dev is present again, so it seems to work. > > But for some reason the tpm is again locked (for no visible reason) due to > "dictionary attack" so I cannot test further ATM :/ > > Regards, > > Laurent > > > > > Regards, > > Jerry > Can you response with the tested-by tag as soon as you can? Before we have tested-by, I cannot land the fix. /Jarkko