Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263923AbTH1Lzg (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:55:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263939AbTH1Lzg (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:55:36 -0400 Received: from 11.ylenurme.ee ([193.40.6.11]:31437 "EHLO linking.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263923AbTH1Lze (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:55:34 -0400 Message-ID: <3F4DFB44.2080802@linking.ee> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:53:24 +0200 From: Valmar Joandi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2594 Lines: 67 Hi. Has there been any changes recently? I search with google for that patch but could'nt find anything, maybe I missed something? And how about 2.6 kernel + 1210sa + sata seagate 120G? -----------------------------FWD MESSAGE-------------------------------------------------- Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G From: Hugo Mills (hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk) Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:44:01 EST * Next message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] Synaptics: support for pass-through port (stick)" * Previous message: Doug McNaught: "Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling" * In reply to: Elmer: "2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G" * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:42:32AM +0300, Elmer wrote: > Tried them on every imaginable way: > > 1. 2.4.21 + my own siimage slight patch, 2.4.21 + simage from ac4, > pure 2.4.21-ac4 > 2. apic, noapic, localapic > 3. uni,smp motherboards, 4 of them > 4. modules, compiled in, > 5. all of options from cards bios > > /proc/interrupts reports 0 interrupts for ide2,3 , whatever I do. > > after bootup, after attacking ide-disk driver, there are lost interrupts. > it recognises disk as correct type, but no communication except: > > 1. under XP it works (but there was no linux at that mb) > 2. hdparm lets change few flags under linux, but no -X succeeds > 3. after waiting for minute those timeouts and booting up, then > /proc/ide/ide2/hde/* reports sensible correct information > > I have the card for few more days, anything to try ? I've tried this card with all of the hdparm options that I could think of. I got no success either. However, Andre Hedrick claims[1] to have got the SiI3112 and 3114 working in his tree (a couple of weeks ago). He's testing it[2] before release. Hugo. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105622034606015&w=2 [2] I believe that one of the tests is whether he's got paid for the work by the people who contracted him to do it, which is where I suspect the real delay is. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- If it ain't broke, hit it again. --- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/