Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp666791imm; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:38:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqhChtwkbAIF1Evy7PNe01OpEshu6OET4ukn2Qzhd9AcbFxLS1zaWiiVgwrTmYZYIH2mttw X-Received: by 2002:a62:14c3:: with SMTP id 186-v6mr5175621pfu.92.1526038683830; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:38:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526038683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WwHXS9kJlxwPGfd3wiRKOScpFZoUipnx3buSUU93Ef9vU7NnTg4KYZeCnIlVffV4LN ylIutMxVlkA/LyBFEimfYAs7tZ3EOFL4/KTpAQLAAB2wVEUTKBPxkXgi3NCL03b+DYcj uS0/BbRC1ncUsBwHd0uWx6mjj9EXdWM68fTo71rxjlCBkb9uQojqu4bNoYR6TpKPyM02 +7nTzdWVSLYxmwq+FMHlCHdcqNRf61Dc4HcbnT2oQ8o4eUPnsdNMP899Zav+vz6mKcDq G289g5JO1AsJdlAjVqObDLe6ClAsdjvCHyrmyBmfADxSD0c2+dB0Pmt88MgSAkn1SWMu lLRg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=HYborJGSuFOPnU5fF9PxGCQ8H4032VvQKGqNNkljwKE=; b=jEczBvgnP+Yl2BnA585ruThiaYN0Dzwvv0lUXQS5mwKje7LH0FI/BBHIbcgsr6IFG8 CKCtWPj5J+1y68wtQp1gD4KxN0/fvOHqkyudny3PfJXvFwG2pe5zSHE3o3vvnxTn5HRS USVKrvoJwQyIpEVLh1/y5/F9siIhUWB6Nb7Hy5EB3BGjhz0LPL3vQCZR/YpZIstxeIVA 5i/8Ezc7rmFPutEF2/7m5lmYhPn3SWQopWMiCjXSum5VM5pLenf0snMRDbf4vnrEB+Uf 9I0HwglxheBk/6orHaagdQr4h9UUJol+kF7CSam3mf26pSrz0gr+BZYGzpb6vz+xNIX8 37sA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=K7EB1qkW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7-v6si2996961plr.553.2018.05.11.04.37.49; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=K7EB1qkW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752AbeEKLhk (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 May 2018 07:37:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:38733 "EHLO mail-ua0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752219AbeEKLhj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 07:37:39 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y8-v6so3390584ual.5 for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HYborJGSuFOPnU5fF9PxGCQ8H4032VvQKGqNNkljwKE=; b=K7EB1qkW815o9gzPUUBiFqbY+tUiDiBNCEmbABvsSiSOaQEBiSLsy/yzyQP7cChxxI l4Jds37msvUxcWvIT/H7Kz59dZhi6LGngK/znZGas0PX87/dbveleEC6A8Nqnvv48xTA OS+ljXFtdkJDSv/0d6rmzHo35WVIdZtGiSAAl/3t9SJZyVgmzMs6s93EttX8rwRRq7Gv CgHjvRvGD4lHkL6KKQ8yj3Od4SgBI3Q7VCs5EjP0ralVdxHNo54Y35oNU7mGorYxjPdL OoU2J+f2p/Eb3amPfDMgcqFc9ykI7cSc2810DpVUnjperzLOqC5F943n0qhPSx8JQ5d9 V/Jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=HYborJGSuFOPnU5fF9PxGCQ8H4032VvQKGqNNkljwKE=; b=pbSuhPyBpyHlqdxyeILQpy+gMYRSItIGByxP1epPfsuenNIqw6hzkJNnBrlwIewMsA FA/ST6leImAZEDL45C5dyGXDb2qI021+V8lzV0shFPw8TjSjU8vj0jEnZJVXpWAKvxzP 9mov46D7581N4HqoSJvh4LM/0RkOrjZyQxUl5YSP7SWNq7xRZpcSACtT2G/i5OARHJz2 eTrJFQXqtkVO16iCqScFwOwUk9aQzmFmpDqTOQhZTGcy7yQ8+uQ4UGE1VjM7O+9o3bkr lE5QmDw2rAEFUwuI/W+0Ms7EmfyQ6uu18s5KayqqVvY7e9y6zjMAhy0PeO9vynvsE0Ro vJGg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd0Xi0sJYYhm6lWDu6Y4tcP00+xYtxkYB1qXzRGYAOVB+U/2RuV cxTv648qNLBac+XUxRRr5juEQHXRUTMPl5oo64P+6g== X-Received: by 2002:a9f:35c5:: with SMTP id u5-v6mr1137933uad.26.1526038657527; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:37:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.144.74 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2018 04:37:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com> References: <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com> From: Pintu Kumar Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:07:37 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: open list , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I need one help. I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I tried the below steps: root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction in root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity 3 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error But I get input/output error. When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ is not working. When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity root@10:~# So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? Thanks, Pintu