Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1948193imm; Sat, 12 May 2018 03:16:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpro0VpgmOE7YGuy0qshcZX0ykgsyVNco7Lz2GnhMkucRwxRRqkTpuEBi/bsF6qB8YDfImj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:3381:: with SMTP id b1-v6mr1915478plc.248.1526120167037; Sat, 12 May 2018 03:16:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526120167; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aeY9Q2KBc1u3veKDy2qfcmFYlfOanawexKCkAR7FuoZYTrN1FVH+pHcKxGY1PfrOCo izu7gRd8GqsLCUH5TMPq3UGa1b3SOGk7AVYvQc4/Z72PoGiCOW3coq00++4WjA5e4OlP YZRdaMyil/QkNdibyMrkS2VFzFixde5/kiFJv0tDI0xIUJA2ZnJ+P/Dvyelao8eAsXH/ Tsr6rRQ+Px0hPjSFfkplUkNLayxax+pPVIHNRSRE8P+Z7q5vxLYKdyD9dM2fYmXi3X4F tyXWwY1UP3ZCtYNqjfs8aueJqfPNkMxiLUZRhm378Ho0J8fdM8b9jdxPqk1Hx4y1V1LU BOiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=GFj30giwm0PMCDke+1aAzvIK0Z9lMxBHA0Ypt2kli1Q=; b=IkkMG/41nfOPClEo/l6z9jNHo/Mi4gaBBmM/6lUUI382Q83f1xGfSfugMtqak5oxRd khcm1l05VYGVdaAggy/wKAnT/TAztn7Q0oT3fBfUa1mbVOOJz1QtT5QSyelnNLaLC8TN TEj+W28tCRBEJsrR5PSdPYGfiKbBurpSdL5vhzv1cTuqeV/SeE6+q4vRHvqM2p9/dfN7 g5wtjQ7C8jucaZp7sovt9mJbE+SOC7HWBJzBbB6+pPmC8ti4bosKiDGPVKiZEoM0S9Ck yfOoikaL11LtA7QDE/l5C1MSkm16ha+MRbpofgpByXHt2agLKLGzmp/FrKX3YQofMtwU 7ShQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x11-v6si4793226pln.163.2018.05.12.03.15.52; Sat, 12 May 2018 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751028AbeELKPn (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 12 May 2018 06:15:43 -0400 Received: from bues.ch ([80.190.117.144]:57834 "EHLO bues.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793AbeELKPm (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2018 06:15:42 -0400 Received: by bues.ch with esmtpsa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fHRYn-00051q-1u; Sat, 12 May 2018 12:15:29 +0200 Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 12:14:58 +0200 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Kalle Valo , Larry Finger , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Matt Redfearn , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] Revert "ssb: Prevent build of PCI host features in module" Message-ID: <20180512121458.58570198@wiggum> In-Reply-To: <2a401060858a337f84039eddef4b3b87@milecki.pl> References: <20180511091715.1989-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <87bmdmcxf6.fsf@codeaurora.org> <727571cb-5d1f-2d99-b050-979edd02106f@lwfinger.net> <877eo9b9d9.fsf@codeaurora.org> <20180512100136.1d26e6d3@wiggum> <2a401060858a337f84039eddef4b3b87@milecki.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/JJmf7D3tMaMVh7Ub.huXVw3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/JJmf7D3tMaMVh7Ub.huXVw3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 12 May 2018 12:00:07 +0200 Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > > Yes, I'm OK with the patch, if we have a third patch that cleans up the > > PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY dependency by moving it to SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE > > where it belongs. (This doesn't need to go into the stable tree.) > > We currently implicitly get that via dependency chain, so this is OK > > for now as-is. =20 >=20 > I'm planning to handle PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY cleanup once my patches hit > net-next.git and then wireless-drivers-next.git. It's to avoid > conflicts. Yes, thanks. Take your time. We're not in a hurry. :) This change should not make a functional difference. --=20 Michael --Sig_/JJmf7D3tMaMVh7Ub.huXVw3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEihRzkKVZOnT2ipsS9TK+HZCNiw4FAlr2vqIACgkQ9TK+HZCN iw6jrhAAoQwH39a/jFaYOxzLTrpcHGjLrRtp4BJcm472fSwu3xxd3ko2fMX9plhg tOVXTA4IVKrBLpJb/ybt3NYXoEltNPrthYvcPtNWkcBMT/qQyK9vPQTSyRsiXLkc ObA5GcPfv3ycH/YYtp4UpeSniXadCC2PJ5EWoioyiuKY6Rxm9v3+S97YhTijyP76 9aLaAJSwOO3jKfDKZUeVbtiXCUy5CIFicwTg9+2QMAKMajwzS/YGehvy/bjfE49p 151Udz5g40ebULrtlxY1MbB7V0k3iHlSmQXlb/biQZoeU56sbEyG2LQWAG4zKUYG 3asvVBfABaGWcVVYaigRqWueunHqgbmkSV4VuEnuYpV6TF4f0nTSyQd4+zxBDbgX HRUKottcx8RDAxIOUAPLodAnOZnv3gkj7p0Fbwu+Zm5NujHQgnD2goGo92VzvIGP DZkLpEHMQp5CfKBb6BVC9pig0eL9iYJM8y6DOliXjae/6D6iDFGhEK+BXX0RDqrk E7AL1LZhGh2pY9CkvlWcCc9aqAlGmWCbSuTaISbJ/VTU9IHXQPnw2h4DT894sKz4 txEzfQRBSww/yN0W/BGH5vNQ377qONMfteX48LPYbyC59Z0mLeEFxzp9SZBNAl/j HG5SpVwnBInusLQm4gstJ0FfxJiA2wPi45/qx0j7tz5v5xl0Fz0= =GPI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JJmf7D3tMaMVh7Ub.huXVw3--