Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC: Coding Style] Best way to split a long function declaration
 with modifiers
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <4fdc0980-d0af-3a02-02e7-0beed8ba05e2@gmail.com>
 <2d0127b079b8c9547519ee8c38a42042ad946d50.camel@perches.com>
From:   Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <79c58d1a-5d30-e3be-b7ad-c561f81d7b16@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 May 2018 19:10:18 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2d0127b079b8c9547519ee8c38a42042ad946d50.camel@perches.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 12/05/18 18:41, Joe Perches wrote:

>> I personally like more the former, not to mention that it uses also one
>> line less, but it seems less common in the sources.
>> The coding style references do not seem to say anything explicit about
>> which style to prefer.

thank you, I could provide a patch to the docs for this case, if it's 
not considered too much of a corner case.

--
igor