Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91dad272-e07d-2ab6-2afa-538294e9cefa@suse.de>
References: <20180501213114.20183-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180507183106.GF2259@tuxbook-pro>
 <91dad272-e07d-2ab6-2afa-538294e9cefa@suse.de>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 00:01:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaYN-wKErERP_65T2NH6L-+8O_ugSgg7pXfkaLkn1A2KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] driver core: make deferring probe forever optional
To:     Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@arm.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> On 05/07/2018 08:31 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

>> Can you please name platform that has enough support for Alexander to
>> care about backwards and forwards compatibility but lacks a pinctrl
>> driver.
>
> ZynqMP is one example that immediately comes to my mind. I'm sure there are
> others too.

Why isn't that using drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c?

How is it so very different from (old) Zynq as it is already using
the same GPIO driver?

Yours,
Linus Walleij