Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264285AbTH1TlG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:41:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264290AbTH1TlG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:41:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.it.wmich.edu ([141.218.1.89]:16120 "EHLO mx1.it.wmich.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264285AbTH1TlE (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:41:04 -0400 Message-ID: <3F4E5ACC.1090500@wmich.edu> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:41:00 -0400 From: Ed Sweetman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030722 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: why no cdda cdrom dma use in 2.6? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 475 Lines: 10 It seems like this is a win win patch for the cdrom that was heavily tested in 2.4 in the akpm tree. I'm just wondering why it was never incorporated into 2.5 and thus 2.6? It's a shame to not have it in the kernel by default. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/