Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264147AbTH1Tpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:45:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264187AbTH1Tpu (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:45:50 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:6099 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264147AbTH1Tpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:45:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:45:48 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Ed Sweetman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: why no cdda cdrom dma use in 2.6? Message-ID: <20030828194548.GG16684@suse.de> References: <3F4E5ACC.1090500@wmich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F4E5ACC.1090500@wmich.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 19 On Thu, Aug 28 2003, Ed Sweetman wrote: > It seems like this is a win win patch for the cdrom that was heavily > tested in 2.4 in the akpm tree. I'm just wondering why it was never > incorporated into 2.5 and thus 2.6? It's a shame to not have it in the > kernel by default. >From my perspective, it would be fine to include in 2.6 right now. The 2.4 patch relied heavily on buffer_heads though, so you would have to adapt the patch to bio first. Actually, it should be doable in a much less hackish manner. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/