Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
        Nathan Harold <nharold@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 43/56] xfrm_user: fix return value from xfrm_user_rcv_msg
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 08:48:48 +0200
Message-Id: <20180514064758.800723206@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180514064754.853201981@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180514064754.853201981@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>

commit 83e2d0587ae859aae75fd9d246c409b10a6bd137 upstream.

It doesn't support to run 32bit 'ip' to set xfrm objdect on 64bit host.
But the return value is unknown for user program:

ip xfrm policy list
RTNETLINK answers: Unknown error 524

Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP:

ip xfrm policy list
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported

Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Harold <nharold@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_b
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 	if (is_compat_task())
-		return -ENOTSUPP;
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 #endif
 
 	type = nlh->nlmsg_type;