Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180509204727.7ff38021@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <CAKMK7uHjA27K8y-kwYFyhLy3cSkJJw8Oe1gP=3hZXdfxcWAcNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm> <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk>
 <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org> <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net>
 <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503230905.GA98604@atomide.com>
 <CAPDyKFrCKkRHwOh-7yfFbvMp+Ykhs7oXrDwhTShSPvUBvpn2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180509084440.GW13402@sirena.org.uk> <CAKMK7uEWYmhA3owSeYM9tNA0tpMm5=4Yqda2j=VfMWi7i8ya8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180509090346.GY13402@sirena.org.uk> <20180509204727.7ff38021@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 10:36:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrhRtLUFfmNNg0iPtJ+Tj5ZzDq6EsYPFc=PY7CmqkFX-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, "w@1wt.eu" <w@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9 May 2018 at 12:47, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
>> > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
>> > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
>> > > home.
>>
>> > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the
>> > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All
>> > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some
>> > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots.
>
> Good idea ... I will see what I can do.
>
>> True.  It's currently only those -fixes branches that people have asked
>> him to merge separately which isn't as big a proportion of trees as have
>> them (perhaps fortunately given people's enthusiasm for fixes branches
>> that don't merge cleanly with their development branches) so we'd also
>> need to encourage people to add them separately.
>
> I currently have 44 such fixes branches.  More welcome!

Great!

Stephen, thanks for picking up the idea so quickly!

I will ping the kernelci folkz to request them to include your new
fixes branch for daily builds.

For mmc, please add my fixes branch according to below.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git fixes

Kind regards
Uffe