Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp4052723imm; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo257icwcgO7bE5PgNrIw8rR5dAZlxSuVf28NLPiMDApCcRyHEx7t+gqrTzKmo/ndXhJsNQ X-Received: by 2002:a63:7341:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr7583746pgn.404.1526287378172; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526287378; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jpUjHO6x4Xu9NaqOX5ekhmx99Efc1IlCNdVxD2aEo65PKI3q/NHuW/sBm+fw6pnsNN ioCZjvNfW+YWcK9eigy4Kltb82znB9WA10+Utyi9FAUptHPtWvxlsIS3u2UFwhiT0oEB fboNscwPkaROxsXsZMLjLduBlN8YdeJpAtDFQDzgS8754aCke0Y69F2OJMb54u6niGWr zzgkekTgQSLB/Hdh3SNfW93a+dLERePYvf2Av2ZdWM+SjX0rMrnMBrUxJTDW+IyoG8Yr SZ0H4liMKvjAnUPZxNft5TuvJFZaXmwL+tr/aJrqofs0EAEtI2GQUmX6Nl2ggnDC53ay Wtww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=CANpvyewQoUuMJfNnyXB/znLFanRRNpd2aooia0jmz0=; b=uhrUearSiwKzevZXFz+oeHow+gHMWudCUwYU+O+rhLjMntg6GJkL76LFCUOfRxASKf 9u8xvE18USuyEwYTZytlKxGA+z0EUB2o0JUS4rgyhXHxoSzKBQ7Yl9zHpIr0NOwCqj28 sQD14rAU1OjSSCI7Sb4WhZGN9YQ1vcB64wzVqDwdO+IS9juMb7Oikq7w5rpKFgr/ACb1 AjHyL7xY5Fqz7c3HgZTaYCZYtvAJJcy12H0c8xbExgKiVGBXeT7wxA45gkSDtjxX9i2H Ly5Xbjwe8bjOUou7IM7p0JZXUA/PSWZrz6CWy20uxWbibohXC4oWBC5/AagzSELawklU Qlqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AyL9mW1K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y199-v6si9512161pfb.284.2018.05.14.01.42.35; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=AyL9mW1K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752391AbeENIko (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 May 2018 04:40:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f195.google.com ([209.85.217.195]:37065 "EHLO mail-ua0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752376AbeENIkL (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 04:40:11 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-f195.google.com with SMTP id i3-v6so7746539uad.4 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=CANpvyewQoUuMJfNnyXB/znLFanRRNpd2aooia0jmz0=; b=AyL9mW1KbaN7esUftNXkYO0wk0oZRHrwRv7kgSAWmb/CacTcNBY7F86YDVFIOJFl7O x7A6aEvbKYA+GLq8neCfAsRCwGOFNBOPOKWx9jnh5fCp4aHBn7uT78ZCLIJc3hjYIfYR /2ISJ0Gqx8LUvp+dsCe/OOiQ6bCUaBZilWPueU+AEVRlT1Pc10DhaypdAsKSFgHDD61c krl7SB5UywWQhlkVeuZdNQAY5j7cyIBXZb/aZ3UC4G72I9VCcw6JYAMzHD5li2vcacvc Wp3ThMmBPBDhMSwmOG91UdlZ42PeFsaSisKiEXUBkERT0uhxK80gM6JVx1+1uabJvlz5 tNZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CANpvyewQoUuMJfNnyXB/znLFanRRNpd2aooia0jmz0=; b=pmU/GvIdabA3gsfeVB4iXRajvAveoystEaF0wSHGFa3QXP8vvfFaJEf2oiwPr+7929 y93N6Touyh0VB9d79SVOWw0ACSDx7BbgapZk0GSRLWnCJ3gs6odE7BYSBPNSqA+MBfdA vee+x4z54HCRmwfqAAqbFWwYV/i4thj9807gMn3tQzkxNq5+FPfg9MKBp9HykhUJtv26 evHoNbsh5aOmdqVFBwPDtYfZDGrqcydkgWgmbgRc4eup+UqnuGSK1DQdQIqSLYoH1InX tc3OpQsI1aEuNe5n+q5Re/JBntuwrAaOuYUXddj+DxfxWvfOyh2e45kIqkWAUL7Jcbck hpiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfLB1u/gM+zqq6xuGMaYY6seQvyWbQS9MiqbrUvMspR20e6Fwsx HnhGm7x4TaWnn98rLQw8uo4fEm4zb/QiKHDbFRw= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:5106:: with SMTP id e6-v6mr11554068uaa.33.1526287210824; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.122.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 01:40:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180514103428.55285a70@bbrezillon> References: <20180502194632.GB18390@sasha-vm> <20180503020550.GP2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503031000.GC29205@thunk.org> <0276fcda-0385-8f22-dbdb-e063f7ed8bbe@roeck-us.net> <20180503224217.GR2714@sirena.org.uk> <20180503230905.GA98604@atomide.com> <20180509084440.GW13402@sirena.org.uk> <20180510164722.GH8514@sasha-vm> <20180514101237.5df1e0d7@bbrezillon> <20180514103428.55285a70@bbrezillon> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:40:10 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fB5kAFAc_uZh9jX4O8wS-EksXT0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Sasha Levin , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "w@1wt.eu" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Boris, On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:29:04 +0200 > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Boris Brezillon >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:00:30 +0200 >> > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Sasha Levin >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 03:44:50PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >> >> >>On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:38:21PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: >> >> > What's worse is that that commit is tagged for stable, which means >> >> > that (given Greg's schedule) it may find it's way to -stable users >> >> > even before some -next users/bots had a chance to test it out. >> >> >> >> I just noticed a case where a commit was picked up for stable, while a >> >> bot had flagged it as a build regression 18 hours earlier (with a CC to >> >> lkml). >> > >> > Also, this patch has been on a tree that I know is tested by Fengguang's >> > robots for more than a week (and in linux-next for 2 days, which, I >> > agree, is probably not enough), and still, I only received the bug >> > report when the patch reached mainline. Are there tests that are only >> > run on Linus' tree? >> >> Have your received a success report from Fengguang's bot, listing all >> configs tested (the broken one should be included; it is included in the >> configs tested on my branches)? > > Yes I did (see below). > > -->8-- > From: kbuild test robot > To: Boris Brezillon > Subject: [bbrezillon-0day:mtd/fixes] BUILD SUCCESS fc3a9e15b492eef707afd56b7478001fdecfe53f > Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 20:05:52 +0800 > User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 > > tree/branch: https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-0day mtd/fixes > branch HEAD: fc3a9e15b492eef707afd56b7478001fdecfe53f mtd: rawnand: Make sure we wait tWB before polling the STATUS reg > > elapsed time: 49m > > configs tested: 142 But the failed config (m68k/allmodconfig) is not listed? BTW, my last report had: configs tested: 178 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds