Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp4336139imm; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqY1l/jK85gnqU0gOubyGD7K8cEGIyg45ALDVzkhGAXgbAhXp/576JEyj4EReEoP7gkLLvD X-Received: by 2002:a62:fb14:: with SMTP id x20-v6mr10498245pfm.48.1526303559346; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526303559; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SSWstowIHtREKWnS7AiH/HH34FuTKcA6dQq0Vs9oCq34gWZwTpB+0mPoY7nK+1ZY7N qoynzFxG67jvbeTLGU6OfmNW+m6ttVnGUgmLVZQXBXJBveg70L+OXtOW/OiJp8+TJxG5 sBf7a1StadfQx1PhYCqS04PLCrk4pyA0MRMwXrrRXbrG5ABBPtimBncE42uRQ1TJWdYT o7kgrp0qbD5Z5HsKkBlrr9QzYXVZBtA3RsMWuGDXy508FZN0dj7v2zT8TEjOENTd+6Sx Iw++f+65UdeIMlbMIpyanLkJXjRvKrnqh9Fqm0bvoJLikVXLdRRHDQ6xdR3iMfxkqh8k tbRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=DnbG5fpwBXA3Cqe24lfdJiMnobVEU9Ezo/o/1xroF4Q=; b=wwA1yJMYPXkrGzKQDwCD21xbhoVgKhNMxP/LPYiwR+NUTw78ZvnDkXekgS+ukWCnwN 2laakYFCVg4iBax5f1RTy0s4GJoLF72Zh19CilczqzmSyZQxAyddegUcGbC8TUq0obA6 MbKNoKTZtZX+KGWLl7JQnlSwTmu14OnmFf5hXefDLFibRgTkWaBgQja+dmXvXIIgbW/B 7bPYWx0h9CVoXdmMk3EwSchJvU6hv0/e7nVdABeAhsOtUepNG6a3efhhgJNhQZt28fTm wY0biDQIh0lGbVzD8uKlavwBuH/2em/M/ZyBjTEwGU4+0RanaUGEmpT65OkiZEGQ3x1d uBNQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f85-v6si9601227pfj.125.2018.05.14.06.12.24; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932168AbeENNLl (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 May 2018 09:11:41 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:39640 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753270AbeENNLi (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 09:11:38 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fIDGK-0007J3-U1; Mon, 14 May 2018 07:11:36 -0600 Received: from [97.90.247.198] (helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1fIDGJ-0003e1-CA; Mon, 14 May 2018 07:11:36 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: David Miller Cc: rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ganeshgr@chelsio.com, nirranjan@chelsio.com, indranil@chelsio.com References: <20180513.201131.1649805811466916646.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:11:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180513.201131.1649805811466916646.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sun, 13 May 2018 20:11:31 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87a7t2mlfn.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1fIDGJ-0003e1-CA;;;mid=<87a7t2mlfn.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.90.247.198;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19Q6dDyJAP4aZhN9lyB6Kpn1tjXjoTW7Jo= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.90.247.198 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4672] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;David Miller X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1057 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.3%), b_tie_ro: 1.93 (0.2%), parse: 1.17 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 29 (2.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.47 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 2.0 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.65 (0.2%), tests_pri_-400: 31 (2.9%), check_bayes: 29 (2.7%), b_tokenize: 10 (0.9%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 3.4 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.5 (0.3%), b_finish: 2.3 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 308 (29.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.84 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.5 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 664 (62.9%), poll_dns_idle: 656 (62.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > I'm deferring this patch series. > > If we can't get a reasonable review from an interested party in 10+ > days, that is not reasonable. > > Resubmit this once someone reviews it properly. David I am out on vacation this week and last (the reason for the delay). The last version of this that I looked at I gave my ack. All of my ABI concerns had been addressed. The only outstanding change I believe was the Eric Dumazet's asking about something being reviewed. I just glanced over it again and I don't see any new issues introduced by the last round of changes. From 10,000 feet flyover design perspectie and from an ABI perspective this patchset seems fine. Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Eric