Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180514072603.GA14099@gmail.com>
References: <CAPcyv4g5p72aiXYh8Tf03tvZq8HNYmTFU95PJGG1iQ4JHcr9PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180514072603.GA14099@gmail.com>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j2HQH1wdsGGWUAiXEKXeoMUWN_HeUEMmkv8PG7RUTtfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: use memcpy_mcsafe() for copy_to_iter() (was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9]
 Series short description)
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Mika_Penttil=C3=A4?= <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Ingo, Thomas, Al, any concerns with this series?
>
> Yeah, so:
>
>    "[PATCH v3 0/9] Series short description"
>
> ... isn't the catchiest of titles to capture my [all too easily distracted]
> attention! ;-)

My bad! After that mistake it became a toss-up between more spam and
hoping the distraction would not throw you off.

> I have marked it now for -tip processing. Linus was happy with this and acked the
> approach, right?

I think "happy" is a strong word when it comes to x86 machine check
handling. My interpretation is that he and Andy acquiesced that this
is about the best we can do with dax+mce as things stand today.