Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp238121imm; Tue, 15 May 2018 00:35:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoIJ12pWafrjIgGXFIqXxRA9L1QlwcMVv1MwqrUrxipkSYluQfS3zR+tt/tWvhDM2RP5yln X-Received: by 2002:a63:3fc9:: with SMTP id m192-v6mr11440085pga.340.1526369709561; Tue, 15 May 2018 00:35:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526369709; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oMuj1snUCmEmnQFkHQKxPeBWpH/lJ05OHhaWweaPE6jotTAqpbHbhxMY6QriaNSjWg qQUwAn/m5Sdo82JV4DMcS9b7yRP5JX1a2l2sBKEKmGf+SdnrH/OrfmeXHSThGCXWK8iN X+ELbl0s6Ked1EsxSqdnuVb23q/FImTknAOuDYE6QqBlQiflrqRfJoJBPuO4gCQ38yea /xWtJ8NDZ8PIGQ28sNJaLqL1P/qes2iwD16dzjCsQfPSMcpxi6B4Hb3Y4Z77vBDaN0b6 vwgUqBICzK8pbBjfVUuRy8HMcn1Uzo+lPPqH4FMWW/gER8QtNl0gjJg1Yalx2d0x99lz fEzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=NxJ6Iy7mH3wfsYb0RHNEM61VOSKXY7BEzSC5jtRO0Fg=; b=Sg1VPM/XSrxMLjb7cOT9D5prIfUbwX9oIDoJhtLeCqviy1fqkAgyokXPcaeEgi8Lm8 Mvb84MinIXpjyDw8m1LahhSnZ7765EAD8wvOjSGKSLnk7ve3LnpL7wkgQt5YaYTCsnrP RIbUekLpEP90xl3bVhO0two7Cwlxr/jJKlAjxEKLKE3UO3SFfuzxNYVQHMHt31wa4W+I ct4SvnlLBmVqj/DWzgD8zoV4+FoD5Cm9DAlIJ8a6zG6NZyNrbRIqL+XPVkW0SJrofqL7 7LqhC3s41yBOHW+fCyIpTaKFauTHCNGGZTbWdN1pdUuEdYFvF7gW8XTJTipGL2FDiUKV 21jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17-v6si8765124pgm.604.2018.05.15.00.34.55; Tue, 15 May 2018 00:35:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752216AbeEOHeo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 May 2018 03:34:44 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:47403 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751626AbeEOHen (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2018 03:34:43 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 1A0C220723; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:34:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB626203B7; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:34:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:34:29 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Chris Moore Cc: "Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale)" , "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "richard@nod.at" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "yamada.masahiro@socionext.com" , "prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "jagdish.gediya@nxp.com" , "shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com" , "Bos, Ties \(Nokia - US/Sunnyvale\)" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] mtd: rawnand: use bit-wise majority to recover the contents of ONFI parameter Message-ID: <20180515093429.34902670@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 May 2018 06:45:51 +0200 Chris Moore wrote: > Hi, > > Le 13/05/2018 à 06:30, Wan, Jane (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) a écrit : > > Per ONFI specification (Rev. 4.0), if all parameter pages have invalid CRC values, the bit-wise majority may be used to recover the contents of the parameter pages from the parameter page copies present. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jane Wan > > --- > > v7: change debug print messages > > v6: support the cases that srcbufs are not contiguous > > v5: make the bit-wise majority functon generic > > v4: move the bit-wise majority code in a separate function > > v3: fix warning message detected by kbuild test robot > > v2: rebase the changes on top of v4.17-rc1 > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > index 72f3a89..b43b784 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > > @@ -5087,6 +5087,35 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_ext_param_page(struct nand_chip *chip, > > } > > > > /* > > + * Recover data with bit-wise majority > > + */ > > +static void nand_bit_wise_majority(const void **srcbufs, > > + unsigned int nsrcbufs, > > + void *dstbuf, > > + unsigned int bufsize) > > +{ > > + int i, j, k; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < bufsize; i++) { > > + u8 cnt, val; > > + > > + val = 0; > > + for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) { > > + cnt = 0; > > + for (k = 0; k < nsrcbufs; k++) { > > + const u8 *srcbuf = srcbufs[k]; > > + > > + if (srcbuf[i] & BIT(j)) > > + cnt++; > > + } > > + if (cnt > nsrcbufs / 2) > > + val |= BIT(j); > > + } > > + ((u8 *)dstbuf)[i] = val; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +/* > > * Check if the NAND chip is ONFI compliant, returns 1 if it is, 0 otherwise. > > */ > > static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip *chip) > > @@ -5102,7 +5131,7 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip *chip) > > return 0; > > > > /* ONFI chip: allocate a buffer to hold its parameter page */ > > - p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL); > > + p = kzalloc((sizeof(*p) * 3), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!p) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > @@ -5113,21 +5142,32 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct nand_chip *chip) > > } > > > > for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { > > - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, sizeof(*p), true); > > + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, &p[i], sizeof(*p), true); > > if (ret) { > > ret = 0; > > goto free_onfi_param_page; > > } > > > > - if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (uint8_t *)p, 254) == > > + if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)&p[i], 254) == > > le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) { > > + if (i) > > + memcpy(p, &p[i], sizeof(*p)); > > break; > > } > > } > > > > if (i == 3) { > > - pr_err("Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting\n"); > > - goto free_onfi_param_page; > > + const void *srcbufs[3] = {p, p + 1, p + 2}; > > + > > + pr_warn("Could not find a valid ONFI parameter page, trying bit-wise majority to recover it\n"); > > + nand_bit_wise_majority(srcbufs, ARRAY_SIZE(srcbufs), p, > > + sizeof(*p)); > > + > > + if (onfi_crc16(ONFI_CRC_BASE, (u8 *)p, 254) != > > + le16_to_cpu(p->crc)) { > > + pr_err("ONFI parameter recovery failed, aborting\n"); > > + goto free_onfi_param_page; > > + } > > } > > > > /* Check version */ > > This version is still hard coded for a three sample bitwise majority vote. > So why not use the method which I suggested previously for v2 and which > I repeat below? Because I want the nand_bit_wise_majority() function to work with nsrcbufs > 3 (the ONFI spec says there's at least 3 copy of the param page, but NAND vendor can decide to put more). Also, if the X copies of the PARAM are corrupted (which is rather unlikely), that means we already spent quite a lot of time reading the different copies and calculating the CRC, so I think we don't care about perf optimizations when doing bit-wise majority. > > The three sample bitwise majority can be implemented without bit level > manipulation using the identity: > majority3(a, b, c) = (a & b) | (a & c) | (b & c) > This can be factorized slightly to (a & (b | c)) | (b & c) > This enables the operation to be performed 8, 16, 32 or even 64 bits at > a time depending on the hardware. > > This method is not only faster and but also more compact. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/