Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 12:06:58 -0400
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        "david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM/X86: Introduce a new guest mapping interface
Message-ID: <20180515160658.GA12122@char.us.oracle.com>
References: <1523829198-13236-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de>
 <b390f953-6fe3-1119-15eb-e3b31e609305@redhat.com>
 <1523880592.22952.9.camel@amazon.de>
 <34b4c91d-46f0-1205-5850-f13ccb70d496@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <34b4c91d-46f0-1205-5850-f13ccb70d496@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/04/2018 14:09, Raslan, KarimAllah wrote:
> >> I assume the caching will also be a separate patch.
> > Yup, do you want me to include it in this one? I already have it, I
> > just thought that I get those bits out first.
>=20
> It's the same for me.
>=20
> Paolo
>=20
> >> It looks good except that I'd squash patches 4 and 9 together.
> > Yup, makes sense. I should have squashed them when I removed the=A0
> > lifecycle change!
> >=20
> > Thanks for the review :)
> >=20
> >> But I'd like a second set of eyes to look at it.

Did anybody else end up reviewing these patches? And would it make sense
to repost a new version with the #4 and #9 squashed? Thanks.

>=20