Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <4fe632fec126388ef14412ea35cca2525f2449c5.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging
 output
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 14:11:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20180515192856.GA24473@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1525964381.git.joe@perches.com>
         <41d9686471d67f6f98d160e5891bf61061515b6d.1525964386.git.joe@perches.com>
         <20180514202910.GI26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <32216d8f154b29400d4c11bae91850591114f7f8.camel@perches.com>
         <20180514222456.GO26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <3c7770a062355650fb61e48a5fbeb9653d98d85a.camel@perches.com>
         <20180514235832.GR26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <0cb282d85c37d9b626933a03574848d17430f04c.camel@perches.com>
         <20180515003205.GT26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
         <20180515192856.GA24473@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:28 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:32:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:23:59PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 16:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > OK, so if I define pr_fmt as follows, I get the old behavior?
> > > > 
> > > > 	#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
> > > 
> > > yes.
> > 
> > OK, then I will queue patches with this for the near term for
> > the various torture files.
> 
> And here is the patch.  Thoughts?

Seems sensible.
Perhaps still do the pr_alert->pr_cont conversions.

cheers, Joe