Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1489632imm; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZob4/4k8nBIJqdTjsCiW8g1yj2RoWmF50YYlpXO8QNzJwWtkQZc7kxSKU5ZS64sDFItFMbL X-Received: by 2002:a65:5789:: with SMTP id b9-v6mr9280735pgr.255.1526445063620; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526445063; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MYievcAUZBKWE54mX/NyYxhZBt6PAVC8yZttcH2d/3sFnvPf+W93qeA2AWNYCWIHtg /h9DIaXNrQtotvohSxLj5lGzvcoEVOO28gSKmB/Eig/8le/RxSuM5CRwsmHWAV1MGCSV WbNppYLPtAPF36hKlSz1w46EoNkMqchup2o9690/9qPw5j81mPJC/3rlRRSMl6szGzNV 07EW2hDZjFif5mrpvjMH/57tKhKwaBsFXs81adDyia0Rj6njasl7wIchiCxTEnVry/hT AWD/sIf7O+CYNS0SDEOzxmgmEuyFHo54tWfMBZB8lzkWGBkLzz467rNmzzIpIl7U9yiA Howw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-id:spamdiagnosticmetadata:spamdiagnosticoutput :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=iSps6Eck4uUnIcXJfZfSS8n0g1yS8rCNbZHmCEeCKYI=; b=ZcuBj54dIQLqfQiNEPIhHE6D6gr3pAd5s4iBizbIS0IdifjZg4/yG5LtjWSPs/rpbV TkeQFbgR3QRmxSxfDZzh43gMXv3E57pH2tgepu4rOTLtSTrhXgMRIlsi18U/vERJ5C5j mAeRVD080iM2C8mGBDlIZzsvnwRFEw8fZ9hrTRgXgOpZuBAOH8shuNuZ1GvY/LOupm9+ DUox0N1EIQuWwE0Yfve+x6h4MoCJANfJS6S+JrDk0TMd8WpuUV3aKCNMi5cVtGXjiOti CnqNVVn9I0xrx/3cIbdJiV9uGVwz2rZZ584QDiqMHEnIsUkIUcdwPNVu5lXs43JxhaEU 5UaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@onevmw.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-vmware-com header.b=NzPR2X7E; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p6-v6si1392730pga.25.2018.05.15.21.30.36; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@onevmw.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-vmware-com header.b=NzPR2X7E; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751402AbeEPEaZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 May 2018 00:30:25 -0400 Received: from mail-dm3nam03on0042.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.41.42]:29338 "EHLO NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbeEPEaX (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 00:30:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iSps6Eck4uUnIcXJfZfSS8n0g1yS8rCNbZHmCEeCKYI=; b=NzPR2X7EPd33XM6cJmDtF7Y3V992795Y4wrmqvCc0L+dyh30+qGwQkEVx/+2s9IXpq3KPSbS21iX5inyUuaL8RrGzykrUMRGX1BxUckQAweeFoP3e48//qlFTSS1No2dkzS2vyCHDh+ILXTXMSS7L3KwQxi6b7TMQnExPZCorAw= Received: from SN2PR05MB2654.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.212.137) by SN2PR05MB2782.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.19.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.776.4; Wed, 16 May 2018 04:30:20 +0000 Received: from SN2PR05MB2654.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4924:30ca:59af:89db]) by SN2PR05MB2654.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4924:30ca:59af:89db%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0776.010; Wed, 16 May 2018 04:30:19 +0000 From: Nadav Amit To: Josh Poimboeuf CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alok Kataria , Christopher Li , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Jan Beulich , Jonathan Corbet , Juergen Gross , Kees Cook , "linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Thomas Gleixner , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions Thread-Topic: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions Thread-Index: AQHT7JNaBX0TIj5NlUyn2mGKiojEhaQxuDkAgAAL0gA= Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 04:30:19 +0000 Message-ID: <03B86732-8D0B-40A7-B09C-5823104E631F@vmware.com> References: <20180515141124.84254-1-namit@vmware.com> <20180516034802.nuf7ft65nvtgc65j@treble> In-Reply-To: <20180516034802.nuf7ft65nvtgc65j@treble> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=namit@vmware.com; x-originating-ip: [2601:647:4580:b719:5df9:e80:3939:60d2] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;SN2PR05MB2782;7:QWOdb1MYt5UP+D2ninh3dBZd5BXPbGqgUWPsXdIKLZiB4JRYDPG3yKaqWXBRRS8Ny2K10Eyqgf+V8ETPOiIfRAB/Po/E02uAP4TT3M/GJiBczaRqJmF8s5bLag5xrUlOrt3utrAT1ey/8bbaTiBayEeOrTymXSQGiKRcnSH672La1sGG8Q06Qx8ldS+3ThjUdBprrgMJ7I0X9dUddkav00soGEObpl5Byvv8kwrvFwZAshU0Ua1z2NOcYqCYxvgZ;20:4BltrassJPmaPWpiH6nt7tblABYD+ZYnLMcSSufq0yggswIh4BfKA4Q7uVSzQgj8ufLtOMWMTZjfDO0eIdMnwieNC1YHY5XpbnE7ajivBlkohgajZzRDnZ5yuZ3ugenwUtTpaDRt7yWslg0AspnfuEKNn5gmm0mMJX5In3v7rF8= x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;SOR; x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI;SCL:-1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(39380400002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(186003)(6436002)(229853002)(8676002)(6486002)(81166006)(81156014)(2616005)(476003)(86362001)(46003)(105586002)(446003)(11346002)(8936002)(6306002)(6512007)(5250100002)(68736007)(36756003)(6116002)(4326008)(106356001)(25786009)(82746002)(6246003)(53936002)(54906003)(6506007)(97736004)(316002)(99286004)(2900100001)(7736002)(2906002)(33656002)(76176011)(3660700001)(305945005)(966005)(3280700002)(5660300001)(83716003)(6916009)(486006)(102836004)(14454004)(7416002)(478600001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:SN2PR05MB2782;H:SN2PR05MB2654.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1; x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020);SRVR:SN2PR05MB2782; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN2PR05MB2782: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011);SRVR:SN2PR05MB2782;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN2PR05MB2782; x-forefront-prvs: 0674DC6DD3 received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: YJ++tUJH9cMRW9+XPCnTZA0K5bUFQiKh40eoQmOBiYo3e1BkoCF4u65+xav3XQQ+FQ3XIvcbeqj8TgupvSf+Ymc9lRq8fRDpaIjqW3qL7QGjMQ5psN+EvbSMNv4/o4kyfDAHAbXG5C3BSc+gdkNmy7tT68ZBwskJtl67b9pJwlLuz0dw0t19jxuKakwpRvKA spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <41EF0C5E06A1F24B953A2126074DC072@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 888ee442-5c1b-4f07-7048-08d5bae5bb60 X-OriginatorOrg: vmware.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 888ee442-5c1b-4f07-7048-08d5bae5bb60 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2018 04:30:19.5789 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR05MB2782 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:11:07AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: >> This patch-set deals with an interesting yet stupid problem: code that >> does not get inlined despite its simplicity. >=20 > I got the 0/8 patch twice, and didn't get the 1/8 patch. Was there an > issue with the sending of the patches? Strange. I am not sure why it happened. Anyhow 1/8 is available here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/15/961 . I will forward it to you. Thanks, Nadav