Received: by 2002:ac0:a594:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m20-v6csp1556251imm; Tue, 15 May 2018 22:52:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqgL1bY9zOTKP8ee1O3gYRWHomnoiuKW5XpbkuZ8Bg5BO77j7tlssNkyuceAXJo8Bc/gt5o X-Received: by 2002:a62:845:: with SMTP id c66-v6mr18395618pfd.189.1526449973951; Tue, 15 May 2018 22:52:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526449973; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=U5YiAJq1iz8V29YbVJoQIe5aeqyS/6Lzchkk8JYYBTaqoCSrqsbGuulGWjwaJQjf7A kzvj0YXfZhH1VFMly/hs1sJRJJqE3Wc/2x/jV1CTp9Hu5qUmPCX+94Q75TVM0zxtj4U8 EO/4LHzXjptCalTv9+pkgCy+njV3zF+r4VDl983ZHCllJkfGfJJ9poWqZrb9pc8MWC01 /8annOYkhtrraIRmNf6MnQL0Bd552ctt+h7eemhqLEE/ej1KOZAlEgCnAjTP51Rci4rE 21SSLDuobN5df8pQQIcWd6UQMtYUEfdAXg7NGmNHvsfvFqwoTTHsb7Nlp5IMb8691pYD s4+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=KFDvUsMt6efpbyeTE67F8e80d72b2Xnqfa8+3b6i+HM=; b=xXxyous56M2ZRfooa2QD93KSmadgqn+V1GeEl6t9xqlBJAsYNrdDtmoSwQc2RkusRY kMtA5qt7vDCsjxSGyxhdbKxze59qJkKs0ggWpLQ/+I3DKfkshiVVIXz9dlgUGiovqi+e foH8yFjlYZCHP/2NqkV2eQXZJ01YEduq+LE3FWGiVFlk5+79M70G+eoqG/rIkzJsMksz IsUb5G3blsAzOV4uuW6BCAg+COwUJx9aOa9Bv/RV0wj/W4Tz4RMNMBbiFLB66QTG5fZ9 uo1OU4YLad1FjUBCfsNiLVx1su7y4oAAJbmQ5mZjhVfjhWFo4LRB2l4LBmGLb3TtRam5 nrRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b3-v6si1514393pgr.76.2018.05.15.22.52.39; Tue, 15 May 2018 22:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752535AbeEPFvt (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 May 2018 01:51:49 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:53042 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752245AbeEPFvq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 01:51:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4G5ngjL048909 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 01:51:45 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j0cebcxcd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 01:51:45 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:51:43 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:51:40 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w4G5pdvB33685720; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:51:39 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454FF4C04E; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:43:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32924C046; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:43:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.endicott.ibm.com (unknown [9.60.15.245]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2018 06:43:28 +0100 (BST) From: Nayna Jain To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, patrickc@us.ibm.com, Nayna Jain Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] tpm: improving granularity in poll sleep times Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 01:51:23 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.3 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18051605-0044-0000-0000-00000552E910 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18051605-0045-0000-0000-0000289453BA Message-Id: <20180516055125.5685-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-05-16_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1805160059 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The existing TPM polling code sleeps in each loop iteration for time in msecs ranging from 1 msecs to 5 msecs. However, many of the TPM commands complete much faster, resulting in unnecessary delays. This set of patches identifies such iterations and optimizes the sleep time. The first patch replaces TPM_POLL_SLEEP with TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL and moves it from tpm_tis_core.c to tpm.h as an enum with value 1 msecs. The second patch further reduces the TPM poll sleep time in get_burstcount() and wait_for_tpm_stat() in tpm_tis_core.c by calling usleep_range() directly. The change is only in the polling time, and the maximum timeout is still maintained the same. Thus, it should not affect the overall existing behavior. Changelog: v4: tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() * added Reviewed-by, Tested-by and Ack-by tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity * included Jarkko's feedback * added Ack-by v3: tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() * added testing platform information * updated patch description for more clarity on reasoning tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity * added testing platform information * added Jarkko's and Mimi's Reviewed-by v2: tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() * merged previously defined two patches into this. * updated patch description as per Jarkko's feedback tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity * directly use usleep_range with finer granularity less than 1msec Nayna Jain (2): tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit() tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 5 ++++- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 +++-------- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.13.3