Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]: perf/x86: store user space frame-pointer value on a
 sample
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
References: <31205dc8-b756-e12b-0249-2ed06c2db9c9@linux.intel.com>
 <20180509145436.GV12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <eb83a97a-2e62-9c18-b738-a92b2f4dee23@linux.intel.com>
 <F6BF3B97-F955-4644-A033-4D20CA7F1922@amacapital.net>
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <15a49a1c-01de-b904-a98b-ecced01b8ddb@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 11:42:18 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F6BF3B97-F955-4644-A033-4D20CA7F1922@amacapital.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,
On 15.05.2018 19:30, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
>> On May 15, 2018, at 1:08 AM, Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>>> On 09.05.2018 17:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:21:36PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Store user space frame-pointer value (BP register) into Perf trace 
>>>> on a sample for a process so the value becomes available when 
>>>> unwinding call stacks for functions gaining event samples.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>>>> index e47b2dbbdef3..8d68658eff7f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
>>>> @@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
>>>
>>>
>>>>     * Most system calls don't save these registers, don't report them.
>>>
>>> ^^^ that worries me and is the reason for the '-1's below. However I
>>> think with all the PTI rework this might no longer be true.
>>>
>>> The Changelog needs to state that user_regs->bp is in fact valid and
>>> ideally point to the commits that makes it so. Also this patch should
>>> update that comment.
>>>
>>> Cc Andy who keeps better track of all that than me.
>>
>> Are there any thoughts so far? Feedback on the matter above is highly appreciated.
> 
> Sorry, I missed this. Can you forward the original patch?  I don’t have it.

Store user space frame-pointer value (BP register) into Perf trace 
on a sample for a process so the value becomes available when 
unwinding call stacks for functions gaining event samples.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index e47b2dbbdef3..8d68658eff7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -156,7 +156,13 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
 	 * Most system calls don't save these registers, don't report them.
 	 */
 	regs_user_copy->bx = -1;
-	regs_user_copy->bp = -1;
+	/*
+	 * Store user space frame-pointer value on sample
+	 * to facilitate stack unwinding for cases when
+	 * user space executable code has such support
+	 * enabled at compile time;
+	 */
+	regs_user_copy->bp = user_regs->bp;
 	regs_user_copy->r12 = -1;
 	regs_user_copy->r13 = -1;
 	regs_user_copy->r14 = -1;

> These days, system calls should save all registers, but I’m not entirely sure I want to promise that they’ll continue to do so forever.
>